CAJ | 학술논문

近几年，行政执法检察监督方兴未艾，理论界也大有争议，多数学者认为其源于宪法上“各级人民检察院是国家的法律监督机关”的规定。然而无论是深究法律监督权的产生及其发展的全过程，还是细察检察机关的权力属性，都无法从中找到法律依据。应该从宪法的整体规定出发而不是片面地以“法律监督者”角度理解检察机关的监察权，行政执法检察监督也不是宪法、法律赋予检察机关的主业，以检察权监督审判权的制度安排来鞭策依法行政才是行政诉讼检察监督的真意所在，行政执法检查监督也才有合法存在的可能。
근궤년，행정집법검찰감독방흥미애，이론계야대유쟁의，다수학자인위기원우헌법상“각급인민검찰원시국가적법률감독궤관”적규정。연이무론시심구법률감독권적산생급기발전적전과정，환시세찰검찰궤관적권력속성，도무법종중조도법률의거。응해종헌법적정체규정출발이불시편면지이“법률감독자”각도리해검찰궤관적감찰권，행정집법검찰감독야불시헌법、법율부여검찰궤관적주업，이검찰권감독심판권적제도안배래편책의법행정재시행정소송검찰감독적진의소재，행정집법검사감독야재유합법존재적가능。
In recent years, the supervision of administrative law enforcement developed rapidly, and it was also intensely debated by the theoretical circle, most scholars believe it is the result of a constitutional " the people's procuratorate at all levels is the national legal supervision organ". Yet neither delves into the whole arising and developing process of legal supervision, nor look into the power property of procuratorial organs, can we find a legal basis. We should set out from the whole constitution rather than one-sided understanding of"watchdog"to look upon the procuratorial organ's right of supervision, and the procuratorial supervision of administrative law enforcement is not its primary mission required by the constitution. Using the procuratorial supervision to supervise the judicial authority is just the true value of the procuratorial supervision of administrative litigation, and also there is a possibility of administration and law enforcement supervision’s legal existence.