CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨直径1.0-3.0cm上尿路结石的六种外科手术方式。方法比较这六种处理方式的术中出血、手术前后HGB差值、住院时间、并发症和结石清除率。结果六组治疗结果及并发症发生率均存在显著性差异。结论随着泌尿外科设备及技术的发展，体外冲击波碎石、经皮肾镜取石术、输尿管硬镜取石术、输尿管软镜取石术、后腹腔镜取石术等各种术式相继出现，但其各有优缺点，泌尿外科医师针对不同患者选择最佳的治疗方案尤为重要。
목적：탐토직경1.0-3.0cm상뇨로결석적륙충외과수술방식。방법비교저륙충처리방식적술중출혈、수술전후HGB차치、주원시간、병발증화결석청제솔。결과륙조치료결과급병발증발생솔균존재현저성차이。결론수착비뇨외과설비급기술적발전，체외충격파쇄석、경피신경취석술、수뇨관경경취석술、수뇨관연경취석술、후복강경취석술등각충술식상계출현，단기각유우결점，비뇨외과의사침대불동환자선택최가적치료방안우위중요。
Objective Six surgical way to explore the 1.0-3.0cm diameter urolithiasis.Meathods Compare this treatment of bleeding in six, HGB difference before and after surgery, hospital stay, complications and stone clearance rate.Results There were significant differences between the results of the six group therapy and complication rates.Conclusion With the development of urology equipment and technology,extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery,ureter hard lithotomy,lithotomy soft ureter after laparoscopic surgery and other surgical stone after another,but each there are advantages and disadvantages for different patients urologists choose the best treatment options is particularly important.