CAJ | 학술논문

四分法究竟由何人所创，至今未有定论。近三十年来，史学界围绕这个问题展开了激烈的学术争论。这场争论大致可分为两个阶段，前一阶段争论的焦点集中在各家对关键性史料的解读上；后一阶段，各家在论证问题时采用了新的研究方法和新史料，在论证方式和文献运用等方面有突破，并对以往研究进行了反思，学术争论的深度和广度不断扩展。梳理这场学术争论，总结其学术贡献，反思其不足之处，有助于正确划分我国古代目录学史的发展阶段。
사분법구경유하인소창，지금미유정론。근삼십년래，사학계위요저개문제전개료격렬적학술쟁론。저장쟁론대치가분위량개계단，전일계단쟁론적초점집중재각가대관건성사료적해독상；후일계단，각가재론증문제시채용료신적연구방법화신사료，재론증방식화문헌운용등방면유돌파，병대이왕연구진행료반사，학술쟁론적심도화엄도불단확전。소리저장학술쟁론，총결기학술공헌，반사기불족지처，유조우정학화분아국고대목록학사적발전계단。
The problem that who invented the Four-Part Classification has been in controversy since ancient times. In the last thirty years, this debate has gone through two stages, in which the first was mainly between Huang Youduo, Tang Mingyuan and others, based on the interpretation of historical materials;Zhang Guye and Dong Enlin were the main characters in the latter, who used new literature and new methods to make a new certificate, the depth and breadth of this academic debate continued expansion. If we can comb the academic debate, summarize its academic contribution and re-flect its deficiencies, it would be beneficial to the correct division of different development stages of ancient bibliography history in China.