中南大学学报（社会科学版）
中南大學學報（社會科學版）
중남대학학보（사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE)
2014年
4期
170-173
,共4页
康德%维特根斯坦%划界%先验逻辑%逻辑型式%明示%默示
康德%維特根斯坦%劃界%先驗邏輯%邏輯型式%明示%默示
강덕%유특근사탄%화계%선험라집%라집형식%명시%묵시
Kaut%Wittgenstein%draw a limit of knowledge%transcendental logic%logical form%say what one can say%keep what one wants to say in silence
康德的《纯粹理性批判》和维特根斯坦的《逻辑哲学论》均以划界为首要任务。康德的划界是明示的、外在的，而维特根斯坦的划界是默示的、内在的。这种差异根源于二者不同的逻辑方法。康德的先验逻辑既关涉形式，又关涉内容，所以在界限之外也有所说；而维特根斯坦的数理逻辑只关涉形式，所以惟有沉默。
康德的《純粹理性批判》和維特根斯坦的《邏輯哲學論》均以劃界為首要任務。康德的劃界是明示的、外在的，而維特根斯坦的劃界是默示的、內在的。這種差異根源于二者不同的邏輯方法。康德的先驗邏輯既關涉形式，又關涉內容，所以在界限之外也有所說；而維特根斯坦的數理邏輯隻關涉形式，所以惟有沉默。
강덕적《순수이성비판》화유특근사탄적《라집철학론》균이화계위수요임무。강덕적화계시명시적、외재적，이유특근사탄적화계시묵시적、내재적。저충차이근원우이자불동적라집방법。강덕적선험라집기관섭형식，우관섭내용，소이재계한지외야유소설；이유특근사탄적수리라집지관섭형식，소이유유침묵。
Kant wants to draw a limit of knowledge in the book《Critique of Pure reason》;Wittgenstein wants to draw a limit of knowledge in the book《Tractatus》too. Kant tells us clearly that what we can know and we can't get any reliable knowledge if we pass the limit of knowledge;Wittgenstein tells that what we can say at all can be said clearly, and we must pass over in silence what we can’t talk about. Kant can express both sides of the limit of the knowledge, but Wittgenstein only draws one side of the limit:what we can say can be said clearly, while the other side we must keep silence. Why is Wittgenstein so different from Kant in drawing the limit of the knowledge? Because they have different logical tools it their books. Kant’s transcendental logic pays attention not only to the logical form but also to the content, while Wittgenstein only pays attention to the logical form.
