现代临床医学
現代臨床醫學
현대림상의학
JOURNAL OF MODERN CLINICAL MEDICINE
2014年
4期
278-280
,共3页
宫颈长度%测量%不同孕期%早产
宮頸長度%測量%不同孕期%早產
궁경장도%측량%불동잉기%조산
cervical length%measurement%different gestation%premature birth
目的:探讨不同孕期测量宫颈长度( CL)预测早产的价值。方法:对定期产前检查的单胎初产孕妇368例,分别于孕24~28周、30~34周经阴道超声测量宫颈长度,观察妊娠不同阶段宫颈长度变化及对早产的预测价值。结果:①宫颈长度变化。孕24~28周测量368例,CL平均37.87±3.10 mm;30~34周测量363例,CL平均为34.23±4.41 mm。二者比较有极显著性差异( P<0.01)。②不同孕期宫颈长度与早产的关系。孕24~28周368例中,足月分娩340例(占92.39%),早产28例(占7.61%)。与CL≥30 mm的孕妇比较,CL 25~29 mm、<25 mm的孕妇早产发生的风险分别为4.35倍、7.97倍,且具有显著性差异( P<0.05)。孕30~34周363例中,足月分娩338例(占93.12%),早产25例(占6.88%)。与CL≥30 mm的孕妇比较,CL 25~29 mm、<25 mm的孕妇早产发生的风险分别为8.4倍、16.04倍,且具有显著性差异( P<0.05)。③不同孕期宫颈长度预测早产的价值。以宫颈长度<25 mm为早产预测值,孕24~28周、30~34周在敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值之间无显著性差异( P>0.05)。结论:孕晚期与孕中期比较,宫颈显著缩短;宫颈长度与早产的发生存在关联,且长度越短风险越大;但是不同孕周宫颈长度在预测早产结果准确性上没有什么区别。
目的:探討不同孕期測量宮頸長度( CL)預測早產的價值。方法:對定期產前檢查的單胎初產孕婦368例,分彆于孕24~28週、30~34週經陰道超聲測量宮頸長度,觀察妊娠不同階段宮頸長度變化及對早產的預測價值。結果:①宮頸長度變化。孕24~28週測量368例,CL平均37.87±3.10 mm;30~34週測量363例,CL平均為34.23±4.41 mm。二者比較有極顯著性差異( P<0.01)。②不同孕期宮頸長度與早產的關繫。孕24~28週368例中,足月分娩340例(佔92.39%),早產28例(佔7.61%)。與CL≥30 mm的孕婦比較,CL 25~29 mm、<25 mm的孕婦早產髮生的風險分彆為4.35倍、7.97倍,且具有顯著性差異( P<0.05)。孕30~34週363例中,足月分娩338例(佔93.12%),早產25例(佔6.88%)。與CL≥30 mm的孕婦比較,CL 25~29 mm、<25 mm的孕婦早產髮生的風險分彆為8.4倍、16.04倍,且具有顯著性差異( P<0.05)。③不同孕期宮頸長度預測早產的價值。以宮頸長度<25 mm為早產預測值,孕24~28週、30~34週在敏感性、特異性、暘性預測值、陰性預測值之間無顯著性差異( P>0.05)。結論:孕晚期與孕中期比較,宮頸顯著縮短;宮頸長度與早產的髮生存在關聯,且長度越短風險越大;但是不同孕週宮頸長度在預測早產結果準確性上沒有什麽區彆。
목적:탐토불동잉기측량궁경장도( CL)예측조산적개치。방법:대정기산전검사적단태초산잉부368례,분별우잉24~28주、30~34주경음도초성측량궁경장도,관찰임신불동계단궁경장도변화급대조산적예측개치。결과:①궁경장도변화。잉24~28주측량368례,CL평균37.87±3.10 mm;30~34주측량363례,CL평균위34.23±4.41 mm。이자비교유겁현저성차이( P<0.01)。②불동잉기궁경장도여조산적관계。잉24~28주368례중,족월분면340례(점92.39%),조산28례(점7.61%)。여CL≥30 mm적잉부비교,CL 25~29 mm、<25 mm적잉부조산발생적풍험분별위4.35배、7.97배,차구유현저성차이( P<0.05)。잉30~34주363례중,족월분면338례(점93.12%),조산25례(점6.88%)。여CL≥30 mm적잉부비교,CL 25~29 mm、<25 mm적잉부조산발생적풍험분별위8.4배、16.04배,차구유현저성차이( P<0.05)。③불동잉기궁경장도예측조산적개치。이궁경장도<25 mm위조산예측치,잉24~28주、30~34주재민감성、특이성、양성예측치、음성예측치지간무현저성차이( P>0.05)。결론:잉만기여잉중기비교,궁경현저축단;궁경장도여조산적발생존재관련,차장도월단풍험월대;단시불동잉주궁경장도재예측조산결과준학성상몰유십요구별。
Objective:To investigate the value of cervical length ( CL ) measurement for prediction of premature birth in different gestation .Methods:Recorded the cervical length of 368 cases of primiparas with single embryo during regular antenatal examination with transvaginal measurement , respectively in 24 ~28 weeks of pregnancy and 30~34 weeks of pregnancy , and observed the predictive value of preterm birth with cervical length change in different stages of pregnancy .Results:①Cervical length changes:in 368 cases of 24~28 weeks pregnancy the CL was 37.87 ±3.10 mm, in 363 cases of 30~34 weeks of pregnancy the CL was 34.23 ±4.41 mm, and the difference was statistically significant ( P <0.01 ) .②The relationship between cervical length and preterm birth in different gestation:368 cases of 24~28 weeks pregnancy , in which there were 340 cases of full -term birth ( 92.39%) , 28 cases of premature birth ( 7.61%) .Compared with in pregnant women with CL≥30 mm, the risk of preterm birth occurred 4.35, 7.97 times respectively in pregnant women with a CL 25~29 mm or <25 mm, the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05 ) . 363 cases of 30 ~34 weeks pregnancy , in which there were 338 cases of full -term birth ( 93.12%) , 25 cases of premature birth ( 6.88%) .Compared with that in pregnant women with CL≥30 mm, the risk of preterm birth occurred 8.4, 16.04 times respectively in pregnant women with a CL 25~29 mm or <25 mm, the difference was statistically significant ( P <0.05 ) .③The value of cervical length measurement for prediction of premature birth in different gestation:Adopted the predictive value of cervical length <25 mm for premature birth, the differences insensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive valuewere not statistical significance (P >0.05) at 24 ~28 weeks and 30 ~34 weeks pregnancy.Conclusion:Compared with in mid -trimester,the cervical length is significantly shortened in late trimester ; the cervicallength is associated with the occurrence of premature birth , the shorter of cervical length the greater of risk;but there is no difference in different cervical lengths with in different gestation for prediction of prematurebirth.