中国社会医学杂志
中國社會醫學雜誌
중국사회의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MEDICINE
2014年
4期
259-262
,共4页
戴冉%罗崴%张知光%郝晓萌
戴冉%囉崴%張知光%郝曉萌
대염%라외%장지광%학효맹
糖尿病%自我管理%健康教育%效果评价
糖尿病%自我管理%健康教育%效果評價
당뇨병%자아관리%건강교육%효과평개
Diabetes%Self-management%Health education%Evaluation
目的:评价开展患者自我管理活动和一般健康教育对糖尿病患者知信行的影响。方法按照以社区为基础的随机对照试验研究设计,将210名自愿参加项目的糖尿病患者随机分为自我管理组(n=106)和健康教育组(n=104),基线时和干预后开展问卷调查,对知信行指标得分进行组内和组间比较。结果①10项指标中,自我管理组干预后9项指标(糖尿病知识知晓情况、饮食管理、运动管理、血糖监测、足部护理和血糖异常处理自我效能、生活方式干预、血糖监测和足部护理行为)得分较干预前提高(P <0.05);健康教育组干预后5项指标(糖尿病知识知晓情况、饮食管理、足部护理和血糖异常处理自我效能、生活方式干预行为)得分较干预前提高(P <0.05);②2组患者相比,自我管理组5项指标(糖尿病知识知晓情况、饮食管理、血糖监测和足部护理自我效能,足部护理行为)得分的改善程度较大(P <0.05)。结论2种干预模式对糖尿病控制都有积极的影响,患者自我管理组的糖尿病知识知晓情况、部分自我效能和部分自我管理行为改善效果优于健康教育组。
目的:評價開展患者自我管理活動和一般健康教育對糖尿病患者知信行的影響。方法按照以社區為基礎的隨機對照試驗研究設計,將210名自願參加項目的糖尿病患者隨機分為自我管理組(n=106)和健康教育組(n=104),基線時和榦預後開展問捲調查,對知信行指標得分進行組內和組間比較。結果①10項指標中,自我管理組榦預後9項指標(糖尿病知識知曉情況、飲食管理、運動管理、血糖鑑測、足部護理和血糖異常處理自我效能、生活方式榦預、血糖鑑測和足部護理行為)得分較榦預前提高(P <0.05);健康教育組榦預後5項指標(糖尿病知識知曉情況、飲食管理、足部護理和血糖異常處理自我效能、生活方式榦預行為)得分較榦預前提高(P <0.05);②2組患者相比,自我管理組5項指標(糖尿病知識知曉情況、飲食管理、血糖鑑測和足部護理自我效能,足部護理行為)得分的改善程度較大(P <0.05)。結論2種榦預模式對糖尿病控製都有積極的影響,患者自我管理組的糖尿病知識知曉情況、部分自我效能和部分自我管理行為改善效果優于健康教育組。
목적:평개개전환자자아관리활동화일반건강교육대당뇨병환자지신행적영향。방법안조이사구위기출적수궤대조시험연구설계,장210명자원삼가항목적당뇨병환자수궤분위자아관리조(n=106)화건강교육조(n=104),기선시화간예후개전문권조사,대지신행지표득분진행조내화조간비교。결과①10항지표중,자아관리조간예후9항지표(당뇨병지식지효정황、음식관리、운동관리、혈당감측、족부호리화혈당이상처리자아효능、생활방식간예、혈당감측화족부호리행위)득분교간예전제고(P <0.05);건강교육조간예후5항지표(당뇨병지식지효정황、음식관리、족부호리화혈당이상처리자아효능、생활방식간예행위)득분교간예전제고(P <0.05);②2조환자상비,자아관리조5항지표(당뇨병지식지효정황、음식관리、혈당감측화족부호리자아효능,족부호리행위)득분적개선정도교대(P <0.05)。결론2충간예모식대당뇨병공제도유적겁적영향,환자자아관리조적당뇨병지식지효정황、부분자아효능화부분자아관리행위개선효과우우건강교육조。
Objectives To evaluate the KAP effects among diabetic patients by different intervention models. Methods A community-based random controlled trial was conducted among 210 volunteer diabetic patients who were divided into self-management group (n = 106 )and health education group (n = 104 ).Results ① Nine (the knowledge about diabetes;the self-efficacy about diet management,exercise management,blood-sugar monitoring, foot care and blood-sugar exception handling;the behavior about lifestyle intervention,blood-sugar monitoring and foot care)of the ten indicator scores were significantly improved compared to those before intervention for self-man-agement group(P <0.05).Five indicator (the knowledge about diabetes;the self-efficacy about diet management, foot care and blood-sugar exception handling;the behavior about lifestyle intervention)scores were significantly higher than those before intervention for health education group(P <0.05).②For the comparison of two groups, the score changes of five indicators (the knowledge about diabetes;the self-efficacy about diet management,blood-sugar monitoring and foot care;the behavior about foot care)for self-management group were more than those for health education group(P <0.05).Conclusions Both of two intervention models were helpful to control diabetes. The effects of the self-management group were better than that of the health education group in knowledge of diabe-tes,part of self-efficacy and parts of self-management behaviors.