中国国土资源经济
中國國土資源經濟
중국국토자원경제
NATURAL RESOURSE ECONOMICS OF CHINA
2014年
8期
4-8
,共5页
对立统一律%自然资源的两重性%集成化开发%对策
對立統一律%自然資源的兩重性%集成化開髮%對策
대립통일률%자연자원적량중성%집성화개발%대책
the law of the unity of opposites%the duality of natural resources%integrated development%countermeasure
国土资源经济学中的任何命题都处在多层次和多方面的相互关系中,对立各方要以另一方为自己存在的条件。在前商品社会中,人们通过具体劳动从自然资源中获得自用的物质资料只有使用价值而没有交换价值。但是在商品社会中,矿产品大多不为自用,而是按其社会必要劳动时间决定的价值与其它产品交换,于是土地产品和土地本身就需要按使用价值和社会价值的两重性来定义。由资本化超额利润决定的净现值或净价值既然与社会财富的增长无关,就只是因丰度较好的资源被私营开发者垄断而占有的社会财富的份额,所以它曾经被马克思称作虚假的社会价值。处在多层次对立统一中的国土资源开发者不可能采用“单打一”的举措取得成效,必须把经过筛选的举措提升为集成化的对策。
國土資源經濟學中的任何命題都處在多層次和多方麵的相互關繫中,對立各方要以另一方為自己存在的條件。在前商品社會中,人們通過具體勞動從自然資源中穫得自用的物質資料隻有使用價值而沒有交換價值。但是在商品社會中,礦產品大多不為自用,而是按其社會必要勞動時間決定的價值與其它產品交換,于是土地產品和土地本身就需要按使用價值和社會價值的兩重性來定義。由資本化超額利潤決定的淨現值或淨價值既然與社會財富的增長無關,就隻是因豐度較好的資源被私營開髮者壟斷而佔有的社會財富的份額,所以它曾經被馬剋思稱作虛假的社會價值。處在多層次對立統一中的國土資源開髮者不可能採用“單打一”的舉措取得成效,必鬚把經過篩選的舉措提升為集成化的對策。
국토자원경제학중적임하명제도처재다층차화다방면적상호관계중,대립각방요이령일방위자기존재적조건。재전상품사회중,인문통과구체노동종자연자원중획득자용적물질자료지유사용개치이몰유교환개치。단시재상품사회중,광산품대다불위자용,이시안기사회필요노동시간결정적개치여기타산품교환,우시토지산품화토지본신취수요안사용개치화사회개치적량중성래정의。유자본화초액리윤결정적정현치혹정개치기연여사회재부적증장무관,취지시인봉도교호적자원피사영개발자롱단이점유적사회재부적빈액,소이타증경피마극사칭작허가적사회개치。처재다층차대립통일중적국토자원개발자불가능채용“단타일”적거조취득성효,필수파경과사선적거조제승위집성화적대책。
Any proposition concerning land and resources economics is in the multi-level and various relationships. Opposition parties need the other party as their existing conditions. In the former commodity society, human being obtained material for private use from natural resources through manual labor. These materials only have value in use, with no exchange value. However, in the commercial society, most of mineral products are not used for ourselves. Rather, we can exchange these mineral products with other products according to their value which is determined by socially necessary labor time. Therefore, giving a deifnition of land and its products need to be in line with the duality of value in use and social value. Now that net present value which is decided by the capitalization excess proifts has nothing to do with the growth of social wealth, it is just the share of social wealth occupied by the private developers, because the abundance resources are monopolized by the private developers. So it was called false social value by Marx. This paper ifnally argues that if the developers of land and resources who are in multi-level unity of opposites want to achieve results, the move of concentration on one thing only is unlikely. So, the selected measures must be promoted to integrated countermeasures.