CAJ | 학술논문

目的：本研究通过BDI-GS(Benefit-Damage Index & General Scores)评价新体系对比评价进口转基因(GM)大豆油与天然大豆油的食用功效及安全性。方法以处于线性生长期的健康 ICR(Institute of Cancer Research)小鼠为研究对象，通过喂食实验，统计9项脏器组织重量、系数及其BDI和GS等指标进行食用安全性判断。结果两种GM大豆油在小鼠生长发育方面不如天然大豆油，综合营养健康效应天然大豆油GS值均在11.0以上，而GM大豆油仅在9.0以上；部分脏器指标的BDI明显降低，主要表现在肺脏、胸腺、脾脏和性腺的营养和健康效应上，与天然大豆油比较存在显著差异(P<0.05及P<0.01)。结论表明GM大豆油在营养及健康效应方面不如国产天然大豆油，且存在农药残留问题。
목적：본연구통과BDI-GS(Benefit-Damage Index & General Scores)평개신체계대비평개진구전기인(GM)대두유여천연대두유적식용공효급안전성。방법이처우선성생장기적건강 ICR(Institute of Cancer Research)소서위연구대상，통과위식실험，통계9항장기조직중량、계수급기BDI화GS등지표진행식용안전성판단。결과량충GM대두유재소서생장발육방면불여천연대두유，종합영양건강효응천연대두유GS치균재11.0이상，이GM대두유부재9.0이상；부분장기지표적BDI명현강저，주요표현재폐장、흉선、비장화성선적영양화건강효응상，여천연대두유비교존재현저차이(P<0.05급P<0.01)。결론표명GM대두유재영양급건강효응방면불여국산천연대두유，차존재농약잔류문제。
Objective In the present study, the functions and edible safety of imported genetically modified (GM) and natural soy oils were comparatively evaluated by the novel BDI-GS (Benefit-Damage Index & General Scores) evaluation system. Methods The healthy ICR(Institute of Cancer Research) mice during linear growth were selected as subject. The judgment of edible safety was made through feeding test and statistically analyzed for 9 indicators of organ or tissue weights, indexes and its BDI and GS values. Results Both GM soy oils were worse in mice growth performance than that of natural soy oil, and comprehensive nutritional and healthy effects GS values for natural soy oil were above 11.0, but those for GM soy oils were merely above 9.0. Part BDI values of organ indicators showed lower effects mainly in lung, thymus, spleen and spermary in nutrition and health, and with significant difference in statistics by compared to natural soy oil (P<0.05; P<0.01). Conclusion It manifests that the GM soy oil in nutrition and health effects is worse than that of the oil extracted from natural soybean produced in China, as well as exists the issue of herbicide residue.