安徽医药
安徽醫藥
안휘의약
ANHUI MEDICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
2014年
11期
2080-2082
,共3页
李念%李天梁%邓超%付振宝%李蜀华
李唸%李天樑%鄧超%付振寶%李蜀華
리념%리천량%산초%부진보%리촉화
腹腔镜%腹股沟疝修补
腹腔鏡%腹股溝疝脩補
복강경%복고구산수보
laparoscopic%inguinal hernia repair
目的:研究免钉合腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的安全性、临床效果,为临床上治疗腹股沟疝提供指导意见。方法将该院收治的腹股沟疝患者255例随机分成观察组130例和对照组125例,观察组采用免钉合腹腔镜修补术,对照组采用钉合腹腔镜修补术,比较两组患者的手术情况和术后并发症发生情况的差异。结果观察组的手术时间、平均住院时间、平均手术费用明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术中出血量两组间比较差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组和对照组的术后各种并发症进行比较,结果两组在复发率、慢性疼痛、感觉异常、阴囊血肿、血清肿、术区感染、睾丸鞘膜积液、大出血、尿路感染等指标上均无明显差异,数据差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论免钉合腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与钉合腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术相比具有减少手术时间、住院时间、平均住院费用的优势,同时不会增加术后并发症和术中出血量。
目的:研究免釘閤腹腔鏡腹股溝疝脩補術治療腹股溝疝的安全性、臨床效果,為臨床上治療腹股溝疝提供指導意見。方法將該院收治的腹股溝疝患者255例隨機分成觀察組130例和對照組125例,觀察組採用免釘閤腹腔鏡脩補術,對照組採用釘閤腹腔鏡脩補術,比較兩組患者的手術情況和術後併髮癥髮生情況的差異。結果觀察組的手術時間、平均住院時間、平均手術費用明顯低于對照組,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);術中齣血量兩組間比較差異不具有統計學意義(P>0.05);觀察組和對照組的術後各種併髮癥進行比較,結果兩組在複髮率、慢性疼痛、感覺異常、陰囊血腫、血清腫、術區感染、睪汍鞘膜積液、大齣血、尿路感染等指標上均無明顯差異,數據差異不具有統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論免釘閤腹腔鏡腹股溝疝脩補術與釘閤腹腔鏡腹股溝疝脩補術相比具有減少手術時間、住院時間、平均住院費用的優勢,同時不會增加術後併髮癥和術中齣血量。
목적:연구면정합복강경복고구산수보술치료복고구산적안전성、림상효과,위림상상치료복고구산제공지도의견。방법장해원수치적복고구산환자255례수궤분성관찰조130례화대조조125례,관찰조채용면정합복강경수보술,대조조채용정합복강경수보술,비교량조환자적수술정황화술후병발증발생정황적차이。결과관찰조적수술시간、평균주원시간、평균수술비용명현저우대조조,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);술중출혈량량조간비교차이불구유통계학의의(P>0.05);관찰조화대조조적술후각충병발증진행비교,결과량조재복발솔、만성동통、감각이상、음낭혈종、혈청종、술구감염、고환초막적액、대출혈、뇨로감염등지표상균무명현차이,수거차이불구유통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론면정합복강경복고구산수보술여정합복강경복고구산수보술상비구유감소수술시간、주원시간、평균주원비용적우세,동시불회증가술후병발증화술중출혈량。
Objective To study the safety and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for inguinal hernia,and to provide guidance for the clinical treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods Two hundred and fifty-five patients with inguinal hernia were random-ized into observation group (n=130) and control group (n=125). The observation group underwent free stapling laparoscopic repair, while the control group underwent stapling laparoscopic repair. Operation and postoperative complications of two groups were com-pared. Results The operation time,the average hospitalization time and the average surgery expenses in the observation group were sig-nificantly lower than those in the control group with statistical difference(P<0. 05). Intraoperative blood loss was not statistically dif-ferent between the two groups(P>0. 05). There were not statistically different between the two groups in such indexes as the rate of re-currence,chronic pain,paresthesia,scrotal hematoma,seroma,surgical site infection,hydrocele,bleeding,and urinary tract infection( P>0. 05). Conclusions Free stapling laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair,compared with stapling laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, has advantages of shorter operation and hospitalization time and lower expenses,which does not increase postoperative complications and amount of bleeding.