中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2014年
24期
92-94
,共3页
骨质疏松%健康教育%骨密度%干预
骨質疏鬆%健康教育%骨密度%榦預
골질소송%건강교육%골밀도%간예
Osteoporosis%Health education%Bone mineral density%Intervention
目的：分析本社区60岁以上居民的骨质疏松的健康教育情况，探讨各种护理对骨质疏松的干预效果。方法：选取2012年6-12月明确诊断为原发性骨质疏松的患者140例作为研究对象，按随机数字表法将患者分为四组，每组35例，采用不同方式干预。第1组为饮食指导；第2组为生活方式指导；第3组为药物指导；第4组为综合方法（综合前三组的干预方法）。所有研究对象均填写调查表，每组由居民推选2名组长进行督导，建立数据库，比较患者骨质疏松的骨密度变化，进行统计学分析。结果：第1、2、3组干预护理后均取得了很好的疗效，与治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；第4组的护理改善情况最明显，与其他三组比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05），且达到无痛。结论：随着人口老龄化骨质疏松患病率增高，居民对此病的认识度也慢慢的提高，但是很多居民预防骨质疏松的方法不全面，造成预防效果不明显，骨质疏松症状没有很大改观。为了让居民更全面了解骨质疏松有着更进一步的防治观念，以社区居民为平台的对比性健康教育有着更深刻理解起着重要作用。
目的：分析本社區60歲以上居民的骨質疏鬆的健康教育情況，探討各種護理對骨質疏鬆的榦預效果。方法：選取2012年6-12月明確診斷為原髮性骨質疏鬆的患者140例作為研究對象，按隨機數字錶法將患者分為四組，每組35例，採用不同方式榦預。第1組為飲食指導；第2組為生活方式指導；第3組為藥物指導；第4組為綜閤方法（綜閤前三組的榦預方法）。所有研究對象均填寫調查錶，每組由居民推選2名組長進行督導，建立數據庫，比較患者骨質疏鬆的骨密度變化，進行統計學分析。結果：第1、2、3組榦預護理後均取得瞭很好的療效，與治療前比較差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）；第4組的護理改善情況最明顯，與其他三組比較差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05），且達到無痛。結論：隨著人口老齡化骨質疏鬆患病率增高，居民對此病的認識度也慢慢的提高，但是很多居民預防骨質疏鬆的方法不全麵，造成預防效果不明顯，骨質疏鬆癥狀沒有很大改觀。為瞭讓居民更全麵瞭解骨質疏鬆有著更進一步的防治觀唸，以社區居民為平檯的對比性健康教育有著更深刻理解起著重要作用。
목적：분석본사구60세이상거민적골질소송적건강교육정황，탐토각충호리대골질소송적간예효과。방법：선취2012년6-12월명학진단위원발성골질소송적환자140례작위연구대상，안수궤수자표법장환자분위사조，매조35례，채용불동방식간예。제1조위음식지도；제2조위생활방식지도；제3조위약물지도；제4조위종합방법（종합전삼조적간예방법）。소유연구대상균전사조사표，매조유거민추선2명조장진행독도，건립수거고，비교환자골질소송적골밀도변화，진행통계학분석。결과：제1、2、3조간예호리후균취득료흔호적료효，여치료전비교차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）；제4조적호리개선정황최명현，여기타삼조비교차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05），차체도무통。결론：수착인구노령화골질소송환병솔증고，거민대차병적인식도야만만적제고，단시흔다거민예방골질소송적방법불전면，조성예방효과불명현，골질소송증상몰유흔대개관。위료양거민경전면료해골질소송유착경진일보적방치관념，이사구거민위평태적대비성건강교육유착경심각리해기착중요작용。
Objective:To analyze the status of osteoporosis health education on residents of this community who were over 60 years old,to discuss the intervention effects of various nursing methods on osteoporosis.Method:140 residents diagnosed as primary osteoporosis from June to December 2012 were enrolled as the research objects, they were randomly divided into 4 groups,each had 35 cases,and were given different interventions. The 1st group was received dietary guidance;the 2nd group was received lifestyle guidance;the 3rd group was given medication guidance;and the 4th group was given comprehensive method(all of the 3 methods mentioned). All of the research objects had filled in the questionnaires,and two group leaders were selected in each group by the residents for supervision. Data base was established,and then patients with osteoporosis were compared for the changes of bone mineral density,which were given statistical analysis. Result:Very good curative effects had been obtained in all of the three interventions with statistically significant difference(P<0.05),but the patients’conditions were changed most significantly in the 4th group,compared with the other three groups,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05)and the patients were painless.Conclusion:As the aging population,prevalence of osteoporosis is increased,and residents’awareness of this disease also slowly improves. But many residents do not prevent the disease comprehensively,thus causing the unobvious prevention effect,and the symptoms of osteoporosis changing only a little. In order to make people more comprehensively understand osteoporosis and have further prevention and control concept,comparative health education with the community residents as the platform plays an important role in more profound understanding.
