中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
16期
213-216
,共4页
蒙丽宇%陈大广%龙际%招国宝
矇麗宇%陳大廣%龍際%招國寶
몽려우%진대엄%룡제%초국보
喉罩LMA技术%术中唤醒麻醉%脊柱外科手术%TCI%BIS
喉罩LMA技術%術中喚醒痳醉%脊柱外科手術%TCI%BIS
후조LMA기술%술중환성마취%척주외과수술%TCI%BIS
Laryngeal mask airway%Intraoperative wake-up anesthesia%Spine surgery%TCI%BIS
目的:通过研究使用喉罩LMA技术联合术中唤醒麻醉应用于脊柱外科手术,以验证喉罩LMA技术联合术中唤醒麻醉中应用的可行性、可控性,及该联合技术在脊柱外科手术中的实用性。方法选择择期行脊柱外科手术的患者60例,随机分成喉罩全麻组(L组)和气管内插管全麻组(Q组)两组,分别在喉罩全麻和气管内插管全麻下进行脊柱外科手术。所有患者均选择以麻醉用药使用TCI技术进行、麻醉深度通过双频指数BIS进行术中麻醉监测管理。结果两组病例术中唤醒实验均成功,两组患者唤醒时间无明显差别。L组患者唤醒过程中各项生命征变化不明显,血流动力学变化明显比Q组平稳(P<0.05),唤醒后躁动、呛咳或恶心呕吐等不良反应发生率明显低于Q组(P<0.05)。结论利用喉罩进行气道管理可以保证气道安全性和优质的麻醉深度可控性,与气管内插管全麻无明显差别,且较后者使患者更加舒适耐受。喉罩LMA技术联合应用于术中唤醒麻醉,确保脊柱外科手术顺利完成。
目的:通過研究使用喉罩LMA技術聯閤術中喚醒痳醉應用于脊柱外科手術,以驗證喉罩LMA技術聯閤術中喚醒痳醉中應用的可行性、可控性,及該聯閤技術在脊柱外科手術中的實用性。方法選擇擇期行脊柱外科手術的患者60例,隨機分成喉罩全痳組(L組)和氣管內插管全痳組(Q組)兩組,分彆在喉罩全痳和氣管內插管全痳下進行脊柱外科手術。所有患者均選擇以痳醉用藥使用TCI技術進行、痳醉深度通過雙頻指數BIS進行術中痳醉鑑測管理。結果兩組病例術中喚醒實驗均成功,兩組患者喚醒時間無明顯差彆。L組患者喚醒過程中各項生命徵變化不明顯,血流動力學變化明顯比Q組平穩(P<0.05),喚醒後躁動、嗆咳或噁心嘔吐等不良反應髮生率明顯低于Q組(P<0.05)。結論利用喉罩進行氣道管理可以保證氣道安全性和優質的痳醉深度可控性,與氣管內插管全痳無明顯差彆,且較後者使患者更加舒適耐受。喉罩LMA技術聯閤應用于術中喚醒痳醉,確保脊柱外科手術順利完成。
목적:통과연구사용후조LMA기술연합술중환성마취응용우척주외과수술,이험증후조LMA기술연합술중환성마취중응용적가행성、가공성,급해연합기술재척주외과수술중적실용성。방법선택택기행척주외과수술적환자60례,수궤분성후조전마조(L조)화기관내삽관전마조(Q조)량조,분별재후조전마화기관내삽관전마하진행척주외과수술。소유환자균선택이마취용약사용TCI기술진행、마취심도통과쌍빈지수BIS진행술중마취감측관리。결과량조병례술중환성실험균성공,량조환자환성시간무명현차별。L조환자환성과정중각항생명정변화불명현,혈류동역학변화명현비Q조평은(P<0.05),환성후조동、창해혹악심구토등불량반응발생솔명현저우Q조(P<0.05)。결론이용후조진행기도관리가이보증기도안전성화우질적마취심도가공성,여기관내삽관전마무명현차별,차교후자사환자경가서괄내수。후조LMA기술연합응용우술중환성마취,학보척주외과수술순리완성。
ObjectiveThis work presents an investigation about the feasibility, controllability and the better utility of the combination of LMA and wake anesthesia applied to spine surgery.Methods 60 cases selective spine surgery patients were randomLy classified into two groups. One group was used the LMA(group L) and the other group was used the endotracheal Intubation. All of the patients were general anesthetized by using the TCI technique and the anesthetic depth was monitored by the bispectral index (BIS) during the operation.Results All patients of the two groups were successfully intraoperative waked up and the wake-up time of the two groups had not obvious difference. The patients of group L kept a stable vital signs and the hemodynamics parameter is better than that of group Q (P<0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse reaction such as dysphoria,cough and postoperative nausea and vomiting was obviously lower than that of groups Q (P<0. 05). Conclusion It is shown that the LMA technique can ensure the safety of airway and the controllable of anesthetic Depth. Compared to the endotracheal Intubation, LMA has the same anesthesia effects and better comfort. Laryngeal mask airway technique combined with the intraoperative wake-up anesthesia can effectively guarantee the successfully completion of spine surgery.