中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2014年
22期
53-55
,共3页
李二红%薛彬%杨勇%牛连君
李二紅%薛彬%楊勇%牛連君
리이홍%설빈%양용%우련군
牙种植%引导骨再生%海奥口腔修复膜%不可吸收膜
牙種植%引導骨再生%海奧口腔脩複膜%不可吸收膜
아충식%인도골재생%해오구강수복막%불가흡수막
Dental implantation%Guided bone regeneration%Heal-All oral biofilm%Non-absorbable film
目的:评价不同修复膜材料在牙种植中引导骨再生的临床效果。方法386例单颗牙缺失行牙种植引导骨再生术患者,采取同期非随机对照的方法分为可吸收膜组(196例)和不可吸收膜组(190例),利用CT三维扫描重建的方法获得两组患者术后植骨厚度和成骨厚度;比较两组患者修复成功情况及术后不良反应情况。结果可吸收膜组患者植骨厚度和成骨厚度分别为(2.34±0.47)mm和(2.61±0.49)mm,均大于不可吸收膜组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);可吸收膜组修复成功率为96.9%,高于不可吸收膜组的82.6%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);可吸收膜组患者总并发症发生率为5.6%,低于不可吸收膜组的16.8%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论可吸收海奥口腔修复膜有助于引导骨再生,提高牙种植修复成功率,降低并发症的发生,值得临床推广应用。
目的:評價不同脩複膜材料在牙種植中引導骨再生的臨床效果。方法386例單顆牙缺失行牙種植引導骨再生術患者,採取同期非隨機對照的方法分為可吸收膜組(196例)和不可吸收膜組(190例),利用CT三維掃描重建的方法穫得兩組患者術後植骨厚度和成骨厚度;比較兩組患者脩複成功情況及術後不良反應情況。結果可吸收膜組患者植骨厚度和成骨厚度分彆為(2.34±0.47)mm和(2.61±0.49)mm,均大于不可吸收膜組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);可吸收膜組脩複成功率為96.9%,高于不可吸收膜組的82.6%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);可吸收膜組患者總併髮癥髮生率為5.6%,低于不可吸收膜組的16.8%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論可吸收海奧口腔脩複膜有助于引導骨再生,提高牙種植脩複成功率,降低併髮癥的髮生,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:평개불동수복막재료재아충식중인도골재생적림상효과。방법386례단과아결실행아충식인도골재생술환자,채취동기비수궤대조적방법분위가흡수막조(196례)화불가흡수막조(190례),이용CT삼유소묘중건적방법획득량조환자술후식골후도화성골후도;비교량조환자수복성공정황급술후불량반응정황。결과가흡수막조환자식골후도화성골후도분별위(2.34±0.47)mm화(2.61±0.49)mm,균대우불가흡수막조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);가흡수막조수복성공솔위96.9%,고우불가흡수막조적82.6%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);가흡수막조환자총병발증발생솔위5.6%,저우불가흡수막조적16.8%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론가흡수해오구강수복막유조우인도골재생,제고아충식수복성공솔,강저병발증적발생,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of different biofilms on guiding bone regeneration in dental im-plantation. Methods Patients with 386 single tooth loss undergone guided bone regeneration in dental implantation were divided into absorbable file group and non-absorbable film group by non-random concurrent controlled trial. Thickness of bone grafting and bone-formation after surgery were reconstructed by computed tomography (CT) three di-mension scanning in the two groups.Successful repair and postoperative adverse reaction in both groups were compared. Results In the absorbable group,thickness of bone grafting and bone-formation was (2.34±0.47) mm and (2.61±0.49) mm, which were both thicker than those in the non-absorbable group with statistical differences (P<0.05).The success rate of repair in the absorbable group was 96.9%,much higher than that in the non-absorbable group accounting for 82.6%, which displayed statistical difference (P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the absorbable group was 5.6%,lower than that in the non-absorbable group with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion Absorbable Heal-All oral biofilm is beneficial to guide bone regeneration,can improve the success rate of dental implant restoration,and reduce the occurrence of complications,which is worthy of expansion in clinic.