实用医学杂志
實用醫學雜誌
실용의학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2014年
16期
2595-2598
,共4页
罗兵%阮祥才%许立新%魏树全%应彦璐%郭静文
囉兵%阮祥纔%許立新%魏樹全%應彥璐%郭靜文
라병%원상재%허립신%위수전%응언로%곽정문
喉罩%通气%支气管镜检查术%老年人
喉罩%通氣%支氣管鏡檢查術%老年人
후조%통기%지기관경검사술%노년인
Laryngeal mask airway(LMA)%Ventilation%Bronchoscopy%Elders
目的:比较喉罩与面罩通气方式用于老年患者纤维支气管镜(纤支镜)检查术的效果。方法:120例ASAⅠ~Ⅲ级的老年患者,根据通气方式的不同随机分为表面麻醉自主呼吸组(Ⅰ组,n=40)、内镜面罩通气组(Ⅱ组,n=40)和喉罩通气组(Ⅲ组,n=40),其中Ⅰ组经鼻导管吸氧、Ⅱ组通过内镜面罩供氧、Ⅲ组插入喉罩控制呼吸。观察术中通气效果、不良反应,记录患者纤支镜检查前、中、后的心率(HR)、平均血压(MAP)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)、血浆去甲肾上腺素的变化以及患者和镜检医师满意度。结果:与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组手术条件好,不良反应少,检查中 MAP、HR 和 NE 波动变化小,手术耗时短,完成度高,患者术后满意度高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01或 P<0.05);Ⅱ组呼吸抑制、呼吸道梗阻发生率、手术耗时高于Ⅲ组(P<0.05)。结论:面罩和喉罩均可安全用于老年人全身麻醉下支气管镜检查术气道管理,后者具有通气可靠、血流动力学平稳和便利的优势,值得临床推荐。
目的:比較喉罩與麵罩通氣方式用于老年患者纖維支氣管鏡(纖支鏡)檢查術的效果。方法:120例ASAⅠ~Ⅲ級的老年患者,根據通氣方式的不同隨機分為錶麵痳醉自主呼吸組(Ⅰ組,n=40)、內鏡麵罩通氣組(Ⅱ組,n=40)和喉罩通氣組(Ⅲ組,n=40),其中Ⅰ組經鼻導管吸氧、Ⅱ組通過內鏡麵罩供氧、Ⅲ組插入喉罩控製呼吸。觀察術中通氣效果、不良反應,記錄患者纖支鏡檢查前、中、後的心率(HR)、平均血壓(MAP)、血氧飽和度(SpO2)、血漿去甲腎上腺素的變化以及患者和鏡檢醫師滿意度。結果:與Ⅰ組比較,Ⅱ組和Ⅲ組手術條件好,不良反應少,檢查中 MAP、HR 和 NE 波動變化小,手術耗時短,完成度高,患者術後滿意度高,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01或 P<0.05);Ⅱ組呼吸抑製、呼吸道梗阻髮生率、手術耗時高于Ⅲ組(P<0.05)。結論:麵罩和喉罩均可安全用于老年人全身痳醉下支氣管鏡檢查術氣道管理,後者具有通氣可靠、血流動力學平穩和便利的優勢,值得臨床推薦。
목적:비교후조여면조통기방식용우노년환자섬유지기관경(섬지경)검사술적효과。방법:120례ASAⅠ~Ⅲ급적노년환자,근거통기방식적불동수궤분위표면마취자주호흡조(Ⅰ조,n=40)、내경면조통기조(Ⅱ조,n=40)화후조통기조(Ⅲ조,n=40),기중Ⅰ조경비도관흡양、Ⅱ조통과내경면조공양、Ⅲ조삽입후조공제호흡。관찰술중통기효과、불량반응,기록환자섬지경검사전、중、후적심솔(HR)、평균혈압(MAP)、혈양포화도(SpO2)、혈장거갑신상선소적변화이급환자화경검의사만의도。결과:여Ⅰ조비교,Ⅱ조화Ⅲ조수술조건호,불량반응소,검사중 MAP、HR 화 NE 파동변화소,수술모시단,완성도고,환자술후만의도고,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01혹 P<0.05);Ⅱ조호흡억제、호흡도경조발생솔、수술모시고우Ⅲ조(P<0.05)。결론:면조화후조균가안전용우노년인전신마취하지기관경검사술기도관리,후자구유통기가고、혈류동역학평은화편리적우세,치득림상추천。
Objective To evaluate the different effects of laryngeal mask and mask ventilation during bronchoscopy in elder patients. Methods 120 old patients (ASA I-III) were divided into three group according to the table of random number as following:surface anesthesia with autonomous respiration (group I);endoscope mask ventilation (group II);laryngeal mask airway ventilation (group III). Oxygen inhalation through nasal tube in groupⅠ,group II and group III was ventilated with endoscope mask and LMA respectively ,thenwe observed whether there were adverse effects or not during the procedure. Results The adverse reactions of group I were more than other groups. Compared with the group I, variance of MAP,HR, RR, SpO2 in the groupⅡand groupⅢ had less changes, the cases with severe bucking decreased significantly, and satisfaction degree increased markedly, (P <0.01or P<0.05 ) . The incidence rate of resp iratory depression and airway obstruction in groupⅡwas higher than that in groupⅢ (P<0.05). Conclusion Endoscope mask ventilation and LMA can both be adopted in analgesia bronchoscopy for old patient. LMA under general anesthesia to transbronchial lung biopsy would control respiration according to the demand at any time.LMA has more advantage in the operation for the stable respiration and hemodynamics and less complications.