CAJ | 학술논문

中国精神疾病预测量表的研制及其信效度检验
중국정신질병예측량표적연제급기신효도검험
Development of Chinese mental disorders predictive scale and verification of reliability and validity

万方数据

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志（电子版） 중화뇌과질병여강복잡지（전자판）
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BRAIN DI8SEASES AND REHABILITATIN(ELECTRONIC EDITION)
2014年 4期 218-222 ,共5页

张理义%何明骏%张其军%陶凤燕%马爱国%刘云%高玉芳%涂德华%白香辉%苏为吉%王丽杰%路芳%宋文党%张信忠%孟新珍%王一牛%谢洪波%周小东

장리의%하명준%장기군%도봉연%마애국%류운%고옥방%도덕화%백향휘%소위길%왕려걸%로방%송문당%장신충%맹신진%왕일우%사홍파%주소동

中国人%精神疾病%预测%信度%效度中國人%精神疾病%預測%信度%效度
중국인%정신질병%예측%신도%효도
Chinese%Mental disorders%Prediction%Reliability%Validity

目的：编制中国精神疾病预测量表并进行信度、效度检验。方法通过预测验构建初问卷，并采用探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、相关分析等方法分析数据，检验其信效度。结果根据因子分析结果，提取11个因子，另含一个掩饰因子，正式量表含有96个条目，累计方差贡献率为55.23％。总量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.844，各个因子的Cronbach′s α系数为0.640～0.788；总量表的分半系数为0.892，各个因子的分半系数为0.617～0.742（均P＜0.01）。验证性因素分析模型拟合优度指数显示：CMIN＝3915.815，DF＝957，CMIN/DF＝4.092，GFI＝0.920，TLI＝0.878，IFI＝0.930，CFI＝0.847，RMSEA＝0.058。总量表的重测相关系数为0.803，各个因子重测相关系数为0.601～0.737（均P＜0.01）。中国精神疾病预测量表各个因子之间存在显著相关，相关系数为0.512～0.948（均P＜0.01），总分及各因子存在显著相关，相关系数为0.673～0.961（均P＜0.01）。除神经症和应激源因子外，中国精神疾病预测量表与中国军人心理健康量表各因子分呈显著正相关，相关系数为0.362～0.618（ P＜0.05或P＜0.01）。结论中国精神疾病预测量表的信度、效度符合心理测量学要求，可作为中国人精神疾病预测的评估工具。
목적：편제중국정신질병예측량표병진행신도、효도검험。방법통과예측험구건초문권，병채용탐색성인소분석、험증성인소분석、상관분석등방법분석수거，검험기신효도。결과근거인자분석결과，제취11개인자，령함일개엄식인자，정식량표함유96개조목，루계방차공헌솔위55.23％。총량표적Cronbach′sα계수위0.844，각개인자적Cronbach′s α계수위0.640～0.788；총량표적분반계수위0.892，각개인자적분반계수위0.617～0.742（균P＜0.01）。험증성인소분석모형의합우도지수현시：CMIN＝3915.815，DF＝957，CMIN/DF＝4.092，GFI＝0.920，TLI＝0.878，IFI＝0.930，CFI＝0.847，RMSEA＝0.058。총량표적중측상관계수위0.803，각개인자중측상관계수위0.601～0.737（균P＜0.01）。중국정신질병예측량표각개인자지간존재현저상관，상관계수위0.512～0.948（균P＜0.01），총분급각인자존재현저상관，상관계수위0.673～0.961（균P＜0.01）。제신경증화응격원인자외，중국정신질병예측량표여중국군인심리건강량표각인자분정현저정상관，상관계수위0.362～0.618（ P＜0.05혹P＜0.01）。결론중국정신질병예측량표적신도、효도부합심리측량학요구，가작위중국인정신질병예측적평고공구。
Objective To develop Chinese Mental Disorders Predictive Scale and verify its reliability and validity .Methods We primarily designed a scale by pretesting ,and revise it by exploratory factor analysis , confirmatory factor analysis , then determined its reliability and validity by factor analysis , correlation-analysis,and so on.Results According to the results of factor analysis ,11 factors were extracted, there were 96 items in the formal scale when one lie factor was added .The factors accounted for 55.23%of total variance.The Cronbach′sαcoefficient of total scale was 0.844 and factors were 0.640-0.788;The split-half correlation coefficient of total scale was 0.892 and factors were 0.617-0.742 ( all P <0.01 ) . Confirmatory factor analysis of the items showed:CMIN=3 915.815 , DF=957 , CMIN/DF=4.092 , GFI=0.920 ,TLI=0.878 ,IFI=0.930 ,CFI=0.847 ,RMSEA=0.058 .The test-retest correlation coefficient of total scale was 0.803 and factors were 0.601-0.737 ( all P<0.01 ) .Inter-scale correlation studies showed that the correlations of other factors were ranging from 0.512 to 0.948 ( all P<0.01 ) .The test of the criterion validity showed:the correlation coefficients of CMDPS were 0.673-0.961 ( all P <0.01 ) .The factors of Chinese mental disorders predictive scale were significantly correlated with Chinese military mental health scale except neurosis and stressor , the correlation coefficients of which were 0.362-0.618 ( P <0.05 or P <0.01 ) . Conclusion The development of the Chinese Mental Disorders Predictive Scale has excellent reliability and validity,complying with psychometric standards .