海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
16期
2362-2365
,共4页
晚期鼻咽癌%药物疗法%希罗达%维持治疗%抗肿瘤药%多剂联用
晚期鼻嚥癌%藥物療法%希囉達%維持治療%抗腫瘤藥%多劑聯用
만기비인암%약물요법%희라체%유지치료%항종류약%다제련용
Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma%Drug therapy%Capecitabine%Maintenance treatment%Anti-neoplastic agents%Multiple agents combination
目的:探讨应用不同剂量希罗达维持性治疗晚期鼻咽癌的疗效及不良反应。方法120例确诊晚期鼻咽癌患者随机分为三组,每组40例。对照组患者应用紫杉醇135 mg/m2+顺铂80 mg/m2,d1,每3周为一个周期,连用4个周期。高剂量维持组患者应用紫杉醇135 mg/m2+顺铂80 mg/m2,d1,每3周为一个周期,连用4个周期;尔后应用希罗达1000 mg/m2 bid,d1~14,进行维持治疗直至疾病进展。低剂量维持组患者应用紫杉醇135 mg/m2+顺铂80 mg/m2,d1,每3周为一个周期,连用4个周期;尔后应用希罗达1000 mg/m2 qd,d1~14,进行维持治疗直至疾病进展。结果120例均可评价疗效。对照组、高剂量维持组和低剂量维持组的有效率分别为45.0%(18/40)、50%(20/40)和47.5%(19/40);中位进展时间分别为(5.650±0.207)个月、(8.900±0.849)个月和(8.400±1.684)个月;中位生存时间分别为(11.3±0.434)个月、(17.8±1.641)个月和(16.9±3.422)个月;1年生存率分别为27.5%(11/40)、70.0%(28/40)和52.5%(21/40)。三组患者的有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但1年生存率、中位进展时间和中位生存时间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。高剂量维持组和低剂量维持组在恶心/呕吐等胃肠道反应方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而在血液毒性和手足综合征方面则差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论口服希罗达维持治疗晚期鼻咽癌疗效佳,并且在毒副反应上,低剂量明显较高剂量消化道反应轻,应用方便,利于长期使用。
目的:探討應用不同劑量希囉達維持性治療晚期鼻嚥癌的療效及不良反應。方法120例確診晚期鼻嚥癌患者隨機分為三組,每組40例。對照組患者應用紫杉醇135 mg/m2+順鉑80 mg/m2,d1,每3週為一箇週期,連用4箇週期。高劑量維持組患者應用紫杉醇135 mg/m2+順鉑80 mg/m2,d1,每3週為一箇週期,連用4箇週期;爾後應用希囉達1000 mg/m2 bid,d1~14,進行維持治療直至疾病進展。低劑量維持組患者應用紫杉醇135 mg/m2+順鉑80 mg/m2,d1,每3週為一箇週期,連用4箇週期;爾後應用希囉達1000 mg/m2 qd,d1~14,進行維持治療直至疾病進展。結果120例均可評價療效。對照組、高劑量維持組和低劑量維持組的有效率分彆為45.0%(18/40)、50%(20/40)和47.5%(19/40);中位進展時間分彆為(5.650±0.207)箇月、(8.900±0.849)箇月和(8.400±1.684)箇月;中位生存時間分彆為(11.3±0.434)箇月、(17.8±1.641)箇月和(16.9±3.422)箇月;1年生存率分彆為27.5%(11/40)、70.0%(28/40)和52.5%(21/40)。三組患者的有效率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但1年生存率、中位進展時間和中位生存時間比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。高劑量維持組和低劑量維持組在噁心/嘔吐等胃腸道反應方麵差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),而在血液毒性和手足綜閤徵方麵則差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論口服希囉達維持治療晚期鼻嚥癌療效佳,併且在毒副反應上,低劑量明顯較高劑量消化道反應輕,應用方便,利于長期使用。
목적:탐토응용불동제량희라체유지성치료만기비인암적료효급불량반응。방법120례학진만기비인암환자수궤분위삼조,매조40례。대조조환자응용자삼순135 mg/m2+순박80 mg/m2,d1,매3주위일개주기,련용4개주기。고제량유지조환자응용자삼순135 mg/m2+순박80 mg/m2,d1,매3주위일개주기,련용4개주기;이후응용희라체1000 mg/m2 bid,d1~14,진행유지치료직지질병진전。저제량유지조환자응용자삼순135 mg/m2+순박80 mg/m2,d1,매3주위일개주기,련용4개주기;이후응용희라체1000 mg/m2 qd,d1~14,진행유지치료직지질병진전。결과120례균가평개료효。대조조、고제량유지조화저제량유지조적유효솔분별위45.0%(18/40)、50%(20/40)화47.5%(19/40);중위진전시간분별위(5.650±0.207)개월、(8.900±0.849)개월화(8.400±1.684)개월;중위생존시간분별위(11.3±0.434)개월、(17.8±1.641)개월화(16.9±3.422)개월;1년생존솔분별위27.5%(11/40)、70.0%(28/40)화52.5%(21/40)。삼조환자적유효솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단1년생존솔、중위진전시간화중위생존시간비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。고제량유지조화저제량유지조재악심/구토등위장도반응방면차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이재혈액독성화수족종합정방면칙차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론구복희라체유지치료만기비인암료효가,병차재독부반응상,저제량명현교고제량소화도반응경,응용방편,리우장기사용。
Objective To explore the efficacy and adverse effects of different dose of capecitabine in the maintenance treatment for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods One hundred and twenty pa-tients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were randomized into three groups evenly. In control group, patients were given Taxol 135 mg/m2 plus Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d1, which were repeated every three weeks and totally for four cycles. In high dose maintanance group, patients were given Taxol 135 mg/m2 plus Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d1, which were repeated every three weeks and totally for four cycles, then Capecitabine maintenance treatment was carried out with 1 000 mg/m2 bid for 14 days. In low dose maintance group, patients were given Taxol 135 mg/m2 d1 plus Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d1, which were repeated every three weeks and totally for four cycles and Capecitabine maintenance treat-ment was then carried out with 1 000 mg/m2 qd for 14 days. Results All 120 patients involved had evaluable lesions. The PR+CR rates of control group, high dose maintance group and low dose maintance group were 45.0%(18/40), 50% (20/40) and 47.5%(19/40) respectively. The ratios of TTP of those three groups were (5.650 ± 0.207) months, (8.900 ± 0.849) months and (8.400 ± 1.684) months respectively, and the ratios of MST were (11.3 ± 0.434) months, (17.8 ± 1.641) months, and (16.9 ± 3.422) months respectively. One-year survival rates of the three groups were 27.5%(11/40), 70.0%(28/40) and 52.5%(21/40) respectively. There were no significant differences among the three groups in PR+CR rate (P>0.05), while there were significant differences among the three groups in one-year survival rate, TTP and MST (P<0.05). For the toxicity, there was significant difference between high dose maintanance group and low dose maintanance group in gastrointestinal reaction, while there were no significant differences in hematological toxicity or hand-foot syndrome (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the ef-ficacy of Capecitabine maintenance treatment is good. The gastrointestinal toxicity of low dose group is milder than that of high dose one. Low dose Capecitabine maintenance treatment is convenient for long-term use.