CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析清华同方计算机辅助精液分析（CASA ）系统与血细胞计数板法精子密度检测结果的一致性，以及不同实验室检测结果的一致性。方法选择2013年4～7月于本院接受精子密度检测的男性受试者100例，由本院检验科进行CASA 和血细胞计数板法精子密度检测，同时由沈阳市生殖医学中心精液检测中心进行CASA精子密度检测，分析不同方法及不同实验室的检测结果。结果血细胞计数板法、CASA（本院检验科）、CA-S A （沈阳市生殖医学中心精液检测中心）精子密度检测结果分别为（101．52±75．56）、（104．45±73．57）、（101．60±73．71）×109/L ，不同方法及不同实验室检测结果比较差异均无统计学意义（ P＞0．05）。不同方法检测结果相关系数为0．944。结论 CASA检测精子密度具有较好的结果准确性和一致性，适用于精子密度检测。
목적：분석청화동방계산궤보조정액분석（CASA ）계통여혈세포계수판법정자밀도검측결과적일치성，이급불동실험실검측결과적일치성。방법선택2013년4～7월우본원접수정자밀도검측적남성수시자100례，유본원검험과진행CASA 화혈세포계수판법정자밀도검측，동시유침양시생식의학중심정액검측중심진행CASA정자밀도검측，분석불동방법급불동실험실적검측결과。결과혈세포계수판법、CASA（본원검험과）、CA-S A （침양시생식의학중심정액검측중심）정자밀도검측결과분별위（101．52±75．56）、（104．45±73．57）、（101．60±73．71）×109/L ，불동방법급불동실험실검측결과비교차이균무통계학의의（ P＞0．05）。불동방법검측결과상관계수위0．944。결론 CASA검측정자밀도구유교호적결과준학성화일치성，괄용우정자밀도검측。
Objective To compare the accuracy and consistency for sperm density between Tsinghua Tongfang computer assisted semen analysis (CASA ) system and blood counting pool method .Methods A total of 100 sub-jects ,receiving sperm density detection from Apr .to Jul .2013 in this hospital ,were enrolled .Sperm density detection was performed in this hospital by using CASA system and blood counting pool method ,and was also performed in Shenyang Reproductive Center by using the same type of CASA system .Results Detection results of blood counting pool method ,CASA system (performed in this hospital) and CASA system (performed in Shenyang Reproductive Center) were (101 .52 ± 75 .56) ,(104 .45 ± 73 .57) and (101 .60 ± 73 .71)× 109/L respectively .There were no statis-tical differences between detection results of different methods and laboratories (P>0 .05) .The regression coefficient between detection results of different methods was 0 .944 .Conclusion CASA system might be with fine accuracy and consistency in detection of sperm density ,which could be used for semen test .