廉政文化研究
廉政文化研究
렴정문화연구
ANTI-CORRUPTION AND INTEGRITY CULTURE STUDIES
2014年
4期
1-10
,共10页
廉政评价%公民参与%功能%动力%机制
廉政評價%公民參與%功能%動力%機製
렴정평개%공민삼여%공능%동력%궤제
integrity evaluation%public participation%function%motivation%mechanism
构建政府廉政评价的公民参与机制,可以促使公民建立对反腐倡廉的理性认知,增强党和政府廉政工作公信力,提升公民满意度。依据参与深度的渐次推进,公民参与廉政评价对廉政建设能够发挥象征功能、鉴定功能、诊断功能、监督功能、战略功能。案例梳理表明,在当前中国各地政府实践探索中,政府廉政评价已逐步从内部评价走向引入民意调查和第三方评估,公民参与正处于从“无效参与”向“有限参与”的推进阶段,只是参与式评价的政府主导色彩仍然浓重。要想进一步增强公民参与廉政评价的动力,使公民在廉政评价动态过程的各环节实现主体身份,关键在于激发被评价对象和参与者两个方面的内在动因,形成公民参与的拉力和推力,进而从“理念-制度-环境-手段”四维度构建公民自主、有序、有效参与廉政评价的合理机制。
構建政府廉政評價的公民參與機製,可以促使公民建立對反腐倡廉的理性認知,增彊黨和政府廉政工作公信力,提升公民滿意度。依據參與深度的漸次推進,公民參與廉政評價對廉政建設能夠髮揮象徵功能、鑒定功能、診斷功能、鑑督功能、戰略功能。案例梳理錶明,在噹前中國各地政府實踐探索中,政府廉政評價已逐步從內部評價走嚮引入民意調查和第三方評估,公民參與正處于從“無效參與”嚮“有限參與”的推進階段,隻是參與式評價的政府主導色綵仍然濃重。要想進一步增彊公民參與廉政評價的動力,使公民在廉政評價動態過程的各環節實現主體身份,關鍵在于激髮被評價對象和參與者兩箇方麵的內在動因,形成公民參與的拉力和推力,進而從“理唸-製度-環境-手段”四維度構建公民自主、有序、有效參與廉政評價的閤理機製。
구건정부렴정평개적공민삼여궤제,가이촉사공민건립대반부창렴적이성인지,증강당화정부렴정공작공신력,제승공민만의도。의거삼여심도적점차추진,공민삼여렴정평개대렴정건설능구발휘상정공능、감정공능、진단공능、감독공능、전략공능。안례소리표명,재당전중국각지정부실천탐색중,정부렴정평개이축보종내부평개주향인입민의조사화제삼방평고,공민삼여정처우종“무효삼여”향“유한삼여”적추진계단,지시삼여식평개적정부주도색채잉연농중。요상진일보증강공민삼여렴정평개적동력,사공민재렴정평개동태과정적각배절실현주체신빈,관건재우격발피평개대상화삼여자량개방면적내재동인,형성공민삼여적랍력화추력,진이종“이념-제도-배경-수단”사유도구건공민자주、유서、유효삼여렴정평개적합리궤제。
Citizens’participating in integrity evaluation of the government can help them to establish a rational cognition on corruption and to enhance their trust and satisfaction with the government. This plays the functions of symbolization, identifica-tion, diagnosis, and supervision as well as the strategic functions. Case studies show that current practice of integrity evaluation has gradually shifted from internal evaluation to surveys of public opinions and third-party evaluation in China. Citizen partici-pation is progressing from invalid participation to limited participation, but is still dominated by government. To enhance the citizens’interest in participating in integrity evaluation and realize their dominant role in every procedure, it’s important to stimulate their inner motivation. Four aspects, which include idea, institution, environment and technological roadmap, will play an important part in building an independent, orderly and effective public participation mechanism of integrity evaluation.