泰山医学院学报
泰山醫學院學報
태산의학원학보
JOURNAL OF TAISHAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
2014年
7期
606-607
,共2页
陈德宏%朱跃明%葛维强%周玮
陳德宏%硃躍明%葛維彊%週瑋
진덕굉%주약명%갈유강%주위
标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术%重型颅脑损伤%预后
標準外傷大骨瓣開顱減壓術%重型顱腦損傷%預後
표준외상대골판개로감압술%중형로뇌손상%예후
standard large trauma craniotomy%severe traumatic brain injury%prognosis
目的:探讨标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术在临床救治重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用价值。方法将2008年6月-2013年6月我院收治的89例重型颅脑损伤患者按不同手术治疗方案随机分为对照组(42例,行常规骨瓣开颅减压术)和观察组(47例,行标准大骨瓣开颅减压术),对两组患者预后效果、术后 GCS 评分及并发症情况进行综合比较。结果①观察组患者预后良好率(63.83%)高于对照组(35.71%)(P ﹤0.01);②术后7d,观察组患者GCS 评分为(9.76±1.14)分,高于对照组的(7.54±1.07)分(P ﹤0.01);③观察组术后并发症发生率(14.89%)明显低于对照组(35.71%)(P ﹤0.05)。结论采用标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤疗效确切,能够明显改善患者预后。
目的:探討標準外傷大骨瓣開顱減壓術在臨床救治重型顱腦損傷患者中的應用價值。方法將2008年6月-2013年6月我院收治的89例重型顱腦損傷患者按不同手術治療方案隨機分為對照組(42例,行常規骨瓣開顱減壓術)和觀察組(47例,行標準大骨瓣開顱減壓術),對兩組患者預後效果、術後 GCS 評分及併髮癥情況進行綜閤比較。結果①觀察組患者預後良好率(63.83%)高于對照組(35.71%)(P ﹤0.01);②術後7d,觀察組患者GCS 評分為(9.76±1.14)分,高于對照組的(7.54±1.07)分(P ﹤0.01);③觀察組術後併髮癥髮生率(14.89%)明顯低于對照組(35.71%)(P ﹤0.05)。結論採用標準外傷大骨瓣開顱減壓術治療重型顱腦損傷療效確切,能夠明顯改善患者預後。
목적:탐토표준외상대골판개로감압술재림상구치중형로뇌손상환자중적응용개치。방법장2008년6월-2013년6월아원수치적89례중형로뇌손상환자안불동수술치료방안수궤분위대조조(42례,행상규골판개로감압술)화관찰조(47례,행표준대골판개로감압술),대량조환자예후효과、술후 GCS 평분급병발증정황진행종합비교。결과①관찰조환자예후량호솔(63.83%)고우대조조(35.71%)(P ﹤0.01);②술후7d,관찰조환자GCS 평분위(9.76±1.14)분,고우대조조적(7.54±1.07)분(P ﹤0.01);③관찰조술후병발증발생솔(14.89%)명현저우대조조(35.71%)(P ﹤0.05)。결론채용표준외상대골판개로감압술치료중형로뇌손상료효학절,능구명현개선환자예후。
Objective:To investigate the application of standard large trauma craniotomy in the clinical treatment of se-vere traumatic brain injury. Methods:Eighty-nine cases severe traumatic brain injury patients in our hospital from June 2008 to June 2013 were randomly divided into the control group(42 cases,were given routine large trauma craniotomy)and the observation group(47 cases,were given standard large trauma craniotomy),the prognosis effect,postoperative GCS score and postoperative complications of two groups were comprehensively compared. Results:① The prognosis was better in the observation group(63. 83% )than that in the control group(35. 71% )(P ﹤ 0. 01);② 7 days after operation,the GCS score of the observation group was 9. 76 ± 1. 14 ,while it was 7. 54 ± 1. 07 in the control group,and there was signifi-cant difference between the two groups(P ﹤ 0. 01). ③ The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group (14. 89% )was lower than that in the control group(35. 71% )(P ﹤ 0. 05). Conclusion:Standard large trauma craniotomy has significant effects on treating severe traumatic brain injury.