检验医学与临床
檢驗醫學與臨床
검험의학여림상
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE AND CLINICAL SCIENCES
2014年
17期
2412-2414
,共3页
黄燕新%姜朝新%叶振望%曾庆洋
黃燕新%薑朝新%葉振望%曾慶洋
황연신%강조신%협진망%증경양
降钙素原%血流感染%诊断
降鈣素原%血流感染%診斷
강개소원%혈류감염%진단
procalcitonin%bloodstream infection%diagnosis
目的:探讨血清降钙素原(PC T )检测对血流感染的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2013年2~11月同时进行血培养和PC T检测的患者356例临床资料,以血培养检测结果将患者分为非血流感染组和血流感染组,比较两组间及革兰阴性菌感染组与革兰阳性菌感染组间血清PC T浓度的差异。结果非血流感染组、血流感染组血清PCT浓度分别为0.21(0.06~1.05)、4.36(0.78~15.60)ng/mL ,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。革兰阴性菌与革兰阳性菌感染组血清PCT浓度分别为5.60(1.23~19.90)、2.04(0.59~9.05)ng/mL ,组间比较差异有统计学意义( P=0.041)。以0.50 ng/m L为临界值,PC T对血流感染的诊断灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为83.1%、64.1%、41.3%、92.6%。结论 PC T定量检测用于血流感染的快速辅助诊断,也有利于血流感染病原菌类型的初步判断,能够为早期抗感染治疗方案的制订提供依据。
目的:探討血清降鈣素原(PC T )檢測對血流感染的診斷價值。方法迴顧性分析2013年2~11月同時進行血培養和PC T檢測的患者356例臨床資料,以血培養檢測結果將患者分為非血流感染組和血流感染組,比較兩組間及革蘭陰性菌感染組與革蘭暘性菌感染組間血清PC T濃度的差異。結果非血流感染組、血流感染組血清PCT濃度分彆為0.21(0.06~1.05)、4.36(0.78~15.60)ng/mL ,組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。革蘭陰性菌與革蘭暘性菌感染組血清PCT濃度分彆為5.60(1.23~19.90)、2.04(0.59~9.05)ng/mL ,組間比較差異有統計學意義( P=0.041)。以0.50 ng/m L為臨界值,PC T對血流感染的診斷靈敏度、特異度、暘性預測值和陰性預測值分彆為83.1%、64.1%、41.3%、92.6%。結論 PC T定量檢測用于血流感染的快速輔助診斷,也有利于血流感染病原菌類型的初步判斷,能夠為早期抗感染治療方案的製訂提供依據。
목적:탐토혈청강개소원(PC T )검측대혈류감염적진단개치。방법회고성분석2013년2~11월동시진행혈배양화PC T검측적환자356례림상자료,이혈배양검측결과장환자분위비혈류감염조화혈류감염조,비교량조간급혁란음성균감염조여혁란양성균감염조간혈청PC T농도적차이。결과비혈류감염조、혈류감염조혈청PCT농도분별위0.21(0.06~1.05)、4.36(0.78~15.60)ng/mL ,조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。혁란음성균여혁란양성균감염조혈청PCT농도분별위5.60(1.23~19.90)、2.04(0.59~9.05)ng/mL ,조간비교차이유통계학의의( P=0.041)。이0.50 ng/m L위림계치,PC T대혈류감염적진단령민도、특이도、양성예측치화음성예측치분별위83.1%、64.1%、41.3%、92.6%。결론 PC T정량검측용우혈류감염적쾌속보조진단,야유리우혈류감염병원균류형적초보판단,능구위조기항감염치료방안적제정제공의거。
Objective To explore the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT ) in bloodstream infection .Methods During Feb .2013 and Nov .2013 ,a total of 356 cases ,undertaking PCT and blood culture detection were divided in-to non-bloodstream infection group and bloodstream infection group ,according to results of blood culture .Mean-while ,cases in bloodstream infection group were divided into Gram-positive (G+ ) infection group and Gram-negative (G-) infection group .The differences of PCT between each group were analyzed .Results Levels of PCT in non-bloodstream infection group and bloodstream infection group were 0 .21(0 .06 -1 .05) and 4 .36(0 .78 -15 .60)ng/mL ,with statistical difference (P<0 .05) .Levels of PCT in G+ infection group and G - infection group were 2 .04 (0 .59-9 .05)and 5 .60(1 .23 -19 .90)ng/mL ,with statistical difference (P<0 .05) .When 0 .50 ng/mL was set as cut-off value of PCT for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection ,the sensitivity ,specificity ,positive and negative pre-dictive value were 83 .1% ,64 .1% ,41 .3% and 92 .6% .Conclusion Quantitative detection of PCT could be used for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infection ,which might be useful to identify the types of pathogenic bacteria and to provide evidence for making plans of early anti-infection therapy .