肿瘤药学
腫瘤藥學
종류약학
ANTI-TUMOR PHARMACY
2014年
4期
286-289
,共4页
赵林%赵凤菊%仁景霞%张春林
趙林%趙鳳菊%仁景霞%張春林
조림%조봉국%인경하%장춘림
同步放化疗%大肠癌%临床疗效
同步放化療%大腸癌%臨床療效
동보방화료%대장암%림상료효
Single-agent concurrent chemotherapy%Colorectal cancer%Clinical efficacy
目的:探讨单药同步放化疗治疗大肠癌的临床疗效和不良反应。方法将2004年至2013年间我院收治的80例大肠癌患者随机分为实验组(50例)和对照组(30例)。实验组患者采用单药同步放化疗方案治疗,对照组采用单药化疗方案治疗,观察和比较两组患者的临床疗效、疼痛缓解情况、血清IL-2和IL-10水平及不良反应。结果治疗后,实验组和对照组的总有效率分别为90.00%和70.00%,实验组显著高于对照组(P<0.05);实验组患者的疼痛改善率显著高于对照组(90.00% vs.66.67%,P<0.05);两组治疗后的血清IL-2水平均显著高于治疗前(P<0.05),而血清IL-10水平均明显低于治疗前(P<0.05),且实验组治疗后血清IL-2水平显著高于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者的不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。结论单药同步放化疗治疗大肠癌较单药化疗更有效,能更显著地改善患者的疼痛和免疫功能,不良反应可耐受,值得临床推广应用。
目的:探討單藥同步放化療治療大腸癌的臨床療效和不良反應。方法將2004年至2013年間我院收治的80例大腸癌患者隨機分為實驗組(50例)和對照組(30例)。實驗組患者採用單藥同步放化療方案治療,對照組採用單藥化療方案治療,觀察和比較兩組患者的臨床療效、疼痛緩解情況、血清IL-2和IL-10水平及不良反應。結果治療後,實驗組和對照組的總有效率分彆為90.00%和70.00%,實驗組顯著高于對照組(P<0.05);實驗組患者的疼痛改善率顯著高于對照組(90.00% vs.66.67%,P<0.05);兩組治療後的血清IL-2水平均顯著高于治療前(P<0.05),而血清IL-10水平均明顯低于治療前(P<0.05),且實驗組治療後血清IL-2水平顯著高于對照組(P<0.05);兩組患者的不良反應髮生率比較,差異無統計學意義。結論單藥同步放化療治療大腸癌較單藥化療更有效,能更顯著地改善患者的疼痛和免疫功能,不良反應可耐受,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:탐토단약동보방화료치료대장암적림상료효화불량반응。방법장2004년지2013년간아원수치적80례대장암환자수궤분위실험조(50례)화대조조(30례)。실험조환자채용단약동보방화료방안치료,대조조채용단약화료방안치료,관찰화비교량조환자적림상료효、동통완해정황、혈청IL-2화IL-10수평급불량반응。결과치료후,실험조화대조조적총유효솔분별위90.00%화70.00%,실험조현저고우대조조(P<0.05);실험조환자적동통개선솔현저고우대조조(90.00% vs.66.67%,P<0.05);량조치료후적혈청IL-2수평균현저고우치료전(P<0.05),이혈청IL-10수평균명현저우치료전(P<0.05),차실험조치료후혈청IL-2수평현저고우대조조(P<0.05);량조환자적불량반응발생솔비교,차이무통계학의의。결론단약동보방화료치료대장암교단약화료경유효,능경현저지개선환자적동통화면역공능,불량반응가내수,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of single-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy for colorectal cancer. Methods Eighty colorectal cancer patients treated in our hospital between January 2004 and Decem-ber 2013 were divided into experiment group (n=50) and control group (n=30) by random number table. The experiment group was treated with single-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while the control group was treated with single chemo-therapy. The clinical efficacy, pain relief rates and serum IL-2/IL-10 levels of the two groups were observed and compared. Results After the treatment, the total effective rate of the experimental group (90%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (70%, P<0.05). The pain relief rate of the experimental group (90%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (66.67%, P>0.05). After treatment, the serum IL-2 levels of the two groups were averagely higher than before treatment, while the serum IL-10 levels were averagely lower than before treatment (P<0.05). In addition, the serum IL-2 level of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Conclusion Single-agent concurrent chemoradio-therapy for colorectal cancer was more effective than single-agent chemotherapy. It has better pain relief rate and better protection of the patient's immune function, and its adverse reactions could be tolerated. It is worthy of clinical application.