辽宁医学院学报
遼寧醫學院學報
료녕의학원학보
JOURNAL OF LIAONING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
4期
68-71
,共4页
护理%本科生%核心能力
護理%本科生%覈心能力
호리%본과생%핵심능력
nursing%undergraduate%core competency
目的:了解我院护理本科生核心能力的现状,分析各能力之间的差异及其影响因素,为管理者掌握我院学生的核心能力状况,提高其水平提供参考依据。方法采用注册护士核心能力量表( Competency Inventory for Registered Nurses, CIRN)对在校护理本科生进行问卷调查。结果我校护理本科生核心能力总分为(158.82依28.03)分,7个维度得分由高到底依次为:法律、伦理实践能力>领导能力>教育、咨询能力>人际关系能力>专业发展能力>临床护理能力>批判性思维、科研能力。核心能力总分在不同年级、不同喜好程度和是否为第一志愿组别间差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05);其中批判性思维及临床护理能力2个维度在三个年级间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),均为大四得分最高。年级和喜好程度是核心能力总分的有效预测变量。结论我校护理本科生核心能力总体处于中等偏上水平,在今后的教育教学中,应重点针对不足之处改进教学方法,进一步提高学生整体核心能力。
目的:瞭解我院護理本科生覈心能力的現狀,分析各能力之間的差異及其影響因素,為管理者掌握我院學生的覈心能力狀況,提高其水平提供參攷依據。方法採用註冊護士覈心能力量錶( Competency Inventory for Registered Nurses, CIRN)對在校護理本科生進行問捲調查。結果我校護理本科生覈心能力總分為(158.82依28.03)分,7箇維度得分由高到底依次為:法律、倫理實踐能力>領導能力>教育、咨詢能力>人際關繫能力>專業髮展能力>臨床護理能力>批判性思維、科研能力。覈心能力總分在不同年級、不同喜好程度和是否為第一誌願組彆間差異具有統計學意義( P<0.05);其中批判性思維及臨床護理能力2箇維度在三箇年級間差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),均為大四得分最高。年級和喜好程度是覈心能力總分的有效預測變量。結論我校護理本科生覈心能力總體處于中等偏上水平,在今後的教育教學中,應重點針對不足之處改進教學方法,進一步提高學生整體覈心能力。
목적:료해아원호리본과생핵심능력적현상,분석각능력지간적차이급기영향인소,위관리자장악아원학생적핵심능력상황,제고기수평제공삼고의거。방법채용주책호사핵심능역량표( Competency Inventory for Registered Nurses, CIRN)대재교호리본과생진행문권조사。결과아교호리본과생핵심능력총분위(158.82의28.03)분,7개유도득분유고도저의차위:법률、윤리실천능력>령도능력>교육、자순능력>인제관계능력>전업발전능력>림상호리능력>비판성사유、과연능력。핵심능력총분재불동년급、불동희호정도화시부위제일지원조별간차이구유통계학의의( P<0.05);기중비판성사유급림상호리능력2개유도재삼개년급간차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),균위대사득분최고。년급화희호정도시핵심능력총분적유효예측변량。결론아교호리본과생핵심능력총체처우중등편상수평,재금후적교육교학중,응중점침대불족지처개진교학방법,진일보제고학생정체핵심능력。
Objective To understand the current situation of core competencies in nursing undergraduates of our college, analyze the differences among the competencies and the influencing factors, in order to provide evidence to managers to grasp the situation in core competency and improve their abilities. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted on nursing undergraduates with compe-tency inventory for registered nurses (CIRN). Results The total score of core competency of all the students was 158.82±28.03. The scores ( from high to low) were in the following 7 aspects:law and ethics, leadership, education and? counseling, interpersonal relationship, professional development, clinical nursing, critical thinking and scientific research. The differences of the total scores of core competencies were statistically significant (P<0.05) in terms of different grades, preference and first choice. There were statisti-cally significant differences between critical thinking and clinical nursing ability in three grades ( P<0.05 ) , and seniors having the highest score. Grade and preference were effective predictor variables for core competency. Conclusion Core competencies of nursing undergraduates in our school are above? the? average. We should focus on improving our teaching methods against the students'disad-vantages to improve their whole core competencies further in the future.