医学新知杂志
醫學新知雜誌
의학신지잡지
JOURNAL OF NEW MEDICINE
2014年
4期
232-233
,共2页
颈部淋巴结%超声弹性成像%常规超声
頸部淋巴結%超聲彈性成像%常規超聲
경부림파결%초성탄성성상%상규초성
Cervical lymph node%Ultrasonic elastography%Conventional ultrasonography
目的：比较超声弹性成像与常规超声检查对颈部肿大淋巴结的诊断价值。方法选取我院2013年1月~2014年1月收治的42例患者共93枚淋巴结，分别进行超声弹性成像和常规超声查两项检查，并评价两种方法的准确性、敏感性和特异性。结果弹性成像诊断的敏感性、特异性与准确性分别为84.10%、91.33%、83.29%；常规超声检查则分别为95.10%、60.25%、80.20%。两种检查方法的准确性无统计学差异（P﹥0.05）。结论超声弹性成像与常规超声检查应用于颈部淋巴结的检查，均有较高诊断价值，在临床使用过程中可根据患者病情选用。
目的：比較超聲彈性成像與常規超聲檢查對頸部腫大淋巴結的診斷價值。方法選取我院2013年1月~2014年1月收治的42例患者共93枚淋巴結，分彆進行超聲彈性成像和常規超聲查兩項檢查，併評價兩種方法的準確性、敏感性和特異性。結果彈性成像診斷的敏感性、特異性與準確性分彆為84.10%、91.33%、83.29%；常規超聲檢查則分彆為95.10%、60.25%、80.20%。兩種檢查方法的準確性無統計學差異（P﹥0.05）。結論超聲彈性成像與常規超聲檢查應用于頸部淋巴結的檢查，均有較高診斷價值，在臨床使用過程中可根據患者病情選用。
목적：비교초성탄성성상여상규초성검사대경부종대림파결적진단개치。방법선취아원2013년1월~2014년1월수치적42례환자공93매림파결，분별진행초성탄성성상화상규초성사량항검사，병평개량충방법적준학성、민감성화특이성。결과탄성성상진단적민감성、특이성여준학성분별위84.10%、91.33%、83.29%；상규초성검사칙분별위95.10%、60.25%、80.20%。량충검사방법적준학성무통계학차이（P﹥0.05）。결론초성탄성성상여상규초성검사응용우경부림파결적검사，균유교고진단개치，재림상사용과정중가근거환자병정선용。
Objective To compare diagnostic value of ultrasonic elastography and conventional ultrasonography on cervical lymph nodes. Methods 42 patients with a total of 93 lymph nodes from Jan. 2013 to Jan. 2014 in our hos-pital received ultrasonic elastography and conventional ultrasonography. Accuracy,sensibility and specificity were ac-cessed and compared. Results Sensibility,specificity and accuracy of ultrasonic elastography were 84. 10%,91. 33%and 83. 29% respectively. Sensibility,specificity and accuracy of conventional ultrasonography were 95. 10%,60. 25%, 80. 20% respectively. There was no significant difference in accuracy between the two methods(P﹥0. 05). Conclu-sion There are high diagnostic value of both ultrasonic elastography and conventional ultrasonography in the diagno-sis of cervical lymph node,which can be used according to the condition of patients.
