临床眼科杂志
臨床眼科雜誌
림상안과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2014年
4期
344-346
,共3页
框架眼镜%角膜接触镜%光学性能
框架眼鏡%角膜接觸鏡%光學性能
광가안경%각막접촉경%광학성능
SP%RGP%Optical properties
目的：探讨框架眼镜（ SP）与角膜接触镜（ RGP）矫正对人眼光学性能的不同影响。方法选取我院2012年3月至2014年3月间收治的需进行视力矫正的164例近视眼患者，将其随机平均分为两组，每组各82人。研究组佩戴角膜接触镜，对照组佩戴框架眼镜，观察两组患者的矫正视力、屈光度、舒适度以及并发症。结果两组患者矫正视力不具有统计学意义（ t ＝0.02， P ＝0．9926＞0.05）。对两组患者中心屈光度进行测量发现，配戴RGP和SP的中心屈光度均为（0.00±0.00）D，差异不具有统计学意义（ F ＝0．07， P ＝0．820＞0.05）；测量其周边屈光度显示，在N30°时配戴RGP的周边屈光度为（0．35±0．98）D，配戴SP的周边屈光度为（2.53±1.92）D，差异显著（ F ＝43.02， P ＝0.000＜0.05）。两组患者佩戴两种视力矫正镜时，以佩戴RGP更舒适，且角膜、结膜相关并发症仅2例。结论框架眼镜与角膜接触镜对视力矫正均较好，但相对于框架眼镜，角膜接触镜更能矫正周边远视性离焦，使周边远视性离焦量大大减少，有助于延缓近视，且佩戴更舒适安全。
目的：探討框架眼鏡（ SP）與角膜接觸鏡（ RGP）矯正對人眼光學性能的不同影響。方法選取我院2012年3月至2014年3月間收治的需進行視力矯正的164例近視眼患者，將其隨機平均分為兩組，每組各82人。研究組珮戴角膜接觸鏡，對照組珮戴框架眼鏡，觀察兩組患者的矯正視力、屈光度、舒適度以及併髮癥。結果兩組患者矯正視力不具有統計學意義（ t ＝0.02， P ＝0．9926＞0.05）。對兩組患者中心屈光度進行測量髮現，配戴RGP和SP的中心屈光度均為（0.00±0.00）D，差異不具有統計學意義（ F ＝0．07， P ＝0．820＞0.05）；測量其週邊屈光度顯示，在N30°時配戴RGP的週邊屈光度為（0．35±0．98）D，配戴SP的週邊屈光度為（2.53±1.92）D，差異顯著（ F ＝43.02， P ＝0.000＜0.05）。兩組患者珮戴兩種視力矯正鏡時，以珮戴RGP更舒適，且角膜、結膜相關併髮癥僅2例。結論框架眼鏡與角膜接觸鏡對視力矯正均較好，但相對于框架眼鏡，角膜接觸鏡更能矯正週邊遠視性離焦，使週邊遠視性離焦量大大減少，有助于延緩近視，且珮戴更舒適安全。
목적：탐토광가안경（ SP）여각막접촉경（ RGP）교정대인안광학성능적불동영향。방법선취아원2012년3월지2014년3월간수치적수진행시력교정적164례근시안환자，장기수궤평균분위량조，매조각82인。연구조패대각막접촉경，대조조패대광가안경，관찰량조환자적교정시력、굴광도、서괄도이급병발증。결과량조환자교정시력불구유통계학의의（ t ＝0.02， P ＝0．9926＞0.05）。대량조환자중심굴광도진행측량발현，배대RGP화SP적중심굴광도균위（0.00±0.00）D，차이불구유통계학의의（ F ＝0．07， P ＝0．820＞0.05）；측량기주변굴광도현시，재N30°시배대RGP적주변굴광도위（0．35±0．98）D，배대SP적주변굴광도위（2.53±1.92）D，차이현저（ F ＝43.02， P ＝0.000＜0.05）。량조환자패대량충시력교정경시，이패대RGP경서괄，차각막、결막상관병발증부2례。결론광가안경여각막접촉경대시력교정균교호，단상대우광가안경，각막접촉경경능교정주변원시성리초，사주변원시성리초량대대감소，유조우연완근시，차패대경서괄안전。
Objective To explore the different effect on Optical Properties of the Eye between RGP and SP . Methods To selected 164 patients with myopia for vision correction that admitted in our hospital in March 2012 to March 2014,which were randomly divided into two groups ,and each group of 82 people.Study group wore RGP , and the control group wpre SP.Two groups were observed in patients with corrected visual acuity , diopter, comfort and complications .Re-sults Two groups patients’ corrected visual acuity was not statistically significant ( t =0.02, P =0.9926>0.05).The two groups of patients with central diopter were measured ,and it showed that wearing RGP and SP center diopter were both (0.00 ±0.00) D.The difference was not statistically significant ( F =0.07, P =0.820>0.05).Measuring peripheral refraction showed that ,in N30 °,the peripheral refraction that wore RGP was (0.35 ±0.98) D, and the peripheral refrac-tion that wore SP was (2.53 ±1.92) D.The difference was statistically significant ( F =43.02, P =0.000<0.05). And wearing RGP is more comfortable and corneal ,conjunctival related complications are only 2 cases.Conclusion SP and RGP for vision correction are good , but relative to SP , RGP can correct peripheral hyperopic defocus , make circumja-cent hyperopic defocus greatly reduced , contribute to the progression of myopia , and wearing more comfortable and safe .
