产经评论
產經評論
산경평론
INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIC REVIEW
2014年
4期
47-54
,共8页
破坏性创新%收入分布%社会福利%新兴市场%市场绩效
破壞性創新%收入分佈%社會福利%新興市場%市場績效
파배성창신%수입분포%사회복리%신흥시장%시장적효
disruptive innovation%income distribution%social welfare%emerging market%market per-formance
通过构建破坏性创新企业与在位企业进行市场竞争的双寡头博弈模型,分析在具有不同收入分布特征市场中破坏性创新企业的市场绩效及社会福利。研究发现,在收入差距较大的市场中,破坏性创新企业获得更大的市场份额和利润,社会福利相对较小;相反,在收入水平较高且分布趋向同质的市场中,在位企业获得更大的市场份额和利润,并且,破坏性创新厂商的利润随着收入水平的提高而降低。同时,随着收入水平的提高,两企业的产品质量不断提高,但质量差距不断扩大,社会总福利也随之增加。最后,进一步阐释了破坏性创新更多地发生于贫富差距较大的新兴市场的微观机制,为企业根据不同市场的收入分布特征选择竞争战略提供理论依据,为相关国家基于收入分布特点制定限制或支持破坏性创新创业政策提供理论参考。
通過構建破壞性創新企業與在位企業進行市場競爭的雙寡頭博弈模型,分析在具有不同收入分佈特徵市場中破壞性創新企業的市場績效及社會福利。研究髮現,在收入差距較大的市場中,破壞性創新企業穫得更大的市場份額和利潤,社會福利相對較小;相反,在收入水平較高且分佈趨嚮同質的市場中,在位企業穫得更大的市場份額和利潤,併且,破壞性創新廠商的利潤隨著收入水平的提高而降低。同時,隨著收入水平的提高,兩企業的產品質量不斷提高,但質量差距不斷擴大,社會總福利也隨之增加。最後,進一步闡釋瞭破壞性創新更多地髮生于貧富差距較大的新興市場的微觀機製,為企業根據不同市場的收入分佈特徵選擇競爭戰略提供理論依據,為相關國傢基于收入分佈特點製定限製或支持破壞性創新創業政策提供理論參攷。
통과구건파배성창신기업여재위기업진행시장경쟁적쌍과두박혁모형,분석재구유불동수입분포특정시장중파배성창신기업적시장적효급사회복리。연구발현,재수입차거교대적시장중,파배성창신기업획득경대적시장빈액화리윤,사회복리상대교소;상반,재수입수평교고차분포추향동질적시장중,재위기업획득경대적시장빈액화리윤,병차,파배성창신엄상적리윤수착수입수평적제고이강저。동시,수착수입수평적제고,량기업적산품질량불단제고,단질량차거불단확대,사회총복리야수지증가。최후,진일보천석료파배성창신경다지발생우빈부차거교대적신흥시장적미관궤제,위기업근거불동시장적수입분포특정선택경쟁전략제공이론의거,위상관국가기우수입분포특점제정한제혹지지파배성창신창업정책제공이론삼고。
The paper sets up a duopoly competition game model between a disruptive innovation firm and an incumbent firm,and analyzes the impact of income distribution on market competition of disruptive innova-tion. The paper discovers that disruptive innovation firm is easier to obtain bigger market share and gain greater market profit in the market with a large income gap,but social welfare is small. On the contrary,in the market with a smaller income gap,the market share,product prices and profit of incumbent firm will increase,profit of disruptive innovation firm will gradually decrease,and social welfare increase as well. This paper further ex-plains the micromechanism that disruptive innovation happens more in emerging economies with Pyramid-dis-tributed ,providing theoretical evidence of choosing competition strategy in different income distribution market for firms,and theoretical reference of implementation of laws to restrict or support disruptive innovation based on income distribution.