赣南医学院学报
贛南醫學院學報
공남의학원학보
JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
2014年
4期
544-546
,共3页
替吉奥%胃癌%维持%治疗
替吉奧%胃癌%維持%治療
체길오%위암%유지%치료
S-1%gastric cancer%maintenance therapy
目的:观察替吉奥在晚期胃癌患者维持治疗的疗效、临床受益率和不良反应。方法:42例初诊为晚期胃癌的患者,经过氟尿嘧啶类组成的联合化疗方案化疗4~6周期,化疗后部分缓解(PR)或稳定(SD)的患者,被随机分为替吉奥维持组和观察组。替吉奥维持组采用替吉奥单药口服,连用4周,停药2周,6周为一个周期。观察组不予任何治疗。治疗2个周期后评价疗效。结果:替吉奥维持组总有效率为42.9%,临床受益率为85.7%,中位疾病进展时间为4.5个月,中位总生存期为7.5个月;观察组总有效率为33.3%,临床受益率为80.9%,中位疾病进展时间为3.0个月,中位总生存期为6.5个月;两组近期疗效、中位疾病进展时间比较差异有统计学意义(P "0.05),临床受益率、不良反应的发生率、总生存时间组间比较差异无统计学意义(P ﹥0.05)。结论:替吉奥在晚期胃癌患者维持治疗疗效肯定、可取得较好的生存质量,毒副作用小。
目的:觀察替吉奧在晚期胃癌患者維持治療的療效、臨床受益率和不良反應。方法:42例初診為晚期胃癌的患者,經過氟尿嘧啶類組成的聯閤化療方案化療4~6週期,化療後部分緩解(PR)或穩定(SD)的患者,被隨機分為替吉奧維持組和觀察組。替吉奧維持組採用替吉奧單藥口服,連用4週,停藥2週,6週為一箇週期。觀察組不予任何治療。治療2箇週期後評價療效。結果:替吉奧維持組總有效率為42.9%,臨床受益率為85.7%,中位疾病進展時間為4.5箇月,中位總生存期為7.5箇月;觀察組總有效率為33.3%,臨床受益率為80.9%,中位疾病進展時間為3.0箇月,中位總生存期為6.5箇月;兩組近期療效、中位疾病進展時間比較差異有統計學意義(P "0.05),臨床受益率、不良反應的髮生率、總生存時間組間比較差異無統計學意義(P ﹥0.05)。結論:替吉奧在晚期胃癌患者維持治療療效肯定、可取得較好的生存質量,毒副作用小。
목적:관찰체길오재만기위암환자유지치료적료효、림상수익솔화불량반응。방법:42례초진위만기위암적환자,경과불뇨밀정류조성적연합화료방안화료4~6주기,화료후부분완해(PR)혹은정(SD)적환자,피수궤분위체길오유지조화관찰조。체길오유지조채용체길오단약구복,련용4주,정약2주,6주위일개주기。관찰조불여임하치료。치료2개주기후평개료효。결과:체길오유지조총유효솔위42.9%,림상수익솔위85.7%,중위질병진전시간위4.5개월,중위총생존기위7.5개월;관찰조총유효솔위33.3%,림상수익솔위80.9%,중위질병진전시간위3.0개월,중위총생존기위6.5개월;량조근기료효、중위질병진전시간비교차이유통계학의의(P "0.05),림상수익솔、불량반응적발생솔、총생존시간조간비교차이무통계학의의(P ﹥0.05)。결론:체길오재만기위암환자유지치료료효긍정、가취득교호적생존질량,독부작용소。
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy,the clinical benefit response and adverse reaction of S-1 in the ma-intenance therapy of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods:Forty-two patients with advanced gastric cancer un-derwent combined chemotherapy of fluorouracil in 4 ~ 6 cycles. The PR or SD patients were divided into S-1 group and observation group after chemotherapy. For the S-1 group,6 weeks constituted a cycle. Among the cycle,4 weeks for S-1 taking,2 weeks for withdrawl. In the observation group,no treatment was performed. Curative efficacy was assessed af-ter 2 cycles. Results:The total response rate of S-1 group was 42. 9% and 33. 3% of the observation group and the TTP were 4. 5 months and 3. 0 months respectively;there were significant difference between the two groups(P " 0. 05). The clinical benefit response of S-1 group was 85. 7% and 80. 9% of the observation group and the MST were 7. 5 months and 6. 5 months respectively. There were no difference between the two groups(P ﹥ 0. 05). Conclusions:The S-1 shows positive effect for patients with advanced gastric cancer in the maintenance therapy. It can achieve a better quality of life and small side effects for the patients.