CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨司法精神病鉴定中精神障碍责任能力的评定状况。方法对38例司法精神病责任能力鉴定资料进行回顾性分析。结果本组中鉴定诊断精神分裂症居首位（26．3％）、精神发育迟滞次之（21．1％）；责任能力评定完全刑事责任能力占36．8％，限制刑事责任能力占36．8％，无刑事责任能力占26．3％。结论精神疾病诊断与刑事责任能力之间无必然因果关系，应根据被鉴定人精神病理内容与案件事实之间是否存在因果关系评定刑事责任能力。
목적：탐토사법정신병감정중정신장애책임능력적평정상황。방법대38례사법정신병책임능력감정자료진행회고성분석。결과본조중감정진단정신분렬증거수위（26．3％）、정신발육지체차지（21．1％）；책임능력평정완전형사책임능력점36．8％，한제형사책임능력점36．8％，무형사책임능력점26．3％。결론정신질병진단여형사책임능력지간무필연인과관계，응근거피감정인정신병리내용여안건사실지간시부존재인과관계평정형사책임능력。
Objective Explore the judgment status of criminal responsibility of mental disorder by forensic psychiatric expertise .Methods Expertise data of 38 cases judging criminal responsibility of mental disorder were retrospectively ana-lyzed .Results Judged schizophrenia headed the list (26 .3% ) ,mental retarda-tion took the second place (21 .1% );total criminal responsibility made up 36 .8% ,limited 36 .8% and no 26 .3% .Conclusion Psychosis diagnoses have no necessary causation with criminal responsibility ,judgments of criminal responsibilities should be based on w hether psychopathologi-cal contents of the accused have causation with criminal responsibility .