临床心身疾病杂志
臨床心身疾病雜誌
림상심신질병잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOSOMATIC DISEASES
2014年
5期
13-15
,共3页
躯体化障碍%西酞普兰%奥氮平%汉密顿焦虑量表%汉密顿抑郁量表%副反应量表
軀體化障礙%西酞普蘭%奧氮平%漢密頓焦慮量錶%漢密頓抑鬱量錶%副反應量錶
구체화장애%서태보란%오담평%한밀돈초필량표%한밀돈억욱량표%부반응량표
SD%citalopram%olanzapine%HAMA%HAMD%TESS
目的:探讨西酞普兰联合奥氮平治疗躯体化障碍的临床疗效和安全性。方法将80例躯体化障碍患者随机为两组,每组40例,两组均口服西酞普兰治疗,研究组联合奥氮平治疗,观察6周。于治疗前后采用症状自评量表躯体化因子、汉密顿焦虑量表、汉密顿抑郁量表评定临床疗效,副反应量表评定不良反应。结果治疗后两组各量表评分均较治疗前有显著下降(P<0.01),同期研究组较对照组下降更显著(P<0.05或0.01);治疗6周末研究组有效率为91.4%,对照组为63.6%,研究组显著高于对照组( P<0.05)。两组副反应量表评分及不良反应发生率比较差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论西酞普兰联合奥氮平治疗躯体化障碍患者起效快,疗效显著,更有利于提高患者的治疗依从性,显著优于单用西酞普兰治疗。
目的:探討西酞普蘭聯閤奧氮平治療軀體化障礙的臨床療效和安全性。方法將80例軀體化障礙患者隨機為兩組,每組40例,兩組均口服西酞普蘭治療,研究組聯閤奧氮平治療,觀察6週。于治療前後採用癥狀自評量錶軀體化因子、漢密頓焦慮量錶、漢密頓抑鬱量錶評定臨床療效,副反應量錶評定不良反應。結果治療後兩組各量錶評分均較治療前有顯著下降(P<0.01),同期研究組較對照組下降更顯著(P<0.05或0.01);治療6週末研究組有效率為91.4%,對照組為63.6%,研究組顯著高于對照組( P<0.05)。兩組副反應量錶評分及不良反應髮生率比較差異均無顯著性(P>0.05)。結論西酞普蘭聯閤奧氮平治療軀體化障礙患者起效快,療效顯著,更有利于提高患者的治療依從性,顯著優于單用西酞普蘭治療。
목적:탐토서태보란연합오담평치료구체화장애적림상료효화안전성。방법장80례구체화장애환자수궤위량조,매조40례,량조균구복서태보란치료,연구조연합오담평치료,관찰6주。우치료전후채용증상자평량표구체화인자、한밀돈초필량표、한밀돈억욱량표평정림상료효,부반응량표평정불량반응。결과치료후량조각량표평분균교치료전유현저하강(P<0.01),동기연구조교대조조하강경현저(P<0.05혹0.01);치료6주말연구조유효솔위91.4%,대조조위63.6%,연구조현저고우대조조( P<0.05)。량조부반응량표평분급불량반응발생솔비교차이균무현저성(P>0.05)。결론서태보란연합오담평치료구체화장애환자기효쾌,료효현저,경유리우제고환자적치료의종성,현저우우단용서태보란치료。
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of citalopram combined with olanzapine in the treatment of somatoform disorders (SD) .Methods Eighty SD patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40 ones each ,both groups took orally citalorpam ,and research group was plus olanzapine for 6 weeks .Efficacies were assessed with the somatization factor of Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) ,Hamil-ton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and adverse reactions with the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) before and after treatment .Results All scale’s scores of both groups lowered more significantly after treatment compared with pre-treatment (P<0 .01) ,so did those in research than in control group in the corresponding period (P<0 .05 or 0 .01);effective rate was significantly higher in research than control group at the end of the 6th week (91 .4% vs .63 .6% , P<0 .05) .There were no significant group differences in the TESS scores and incidences of adverse reac-tions (P>0 .05) .Conclusion Citaiopram plus olanzapine takes effect more rapidly ,has an evident effect , and is more beneficial to improve patients’ compliance compared with single citaiopram in somatoform dis-orders .