CAJ | 학술논문

研究使用 GB/T 5497-1985法、ASAE 法和 GAC2100快速仪器法三种方法对大豆中的水分含量进行测定，以确定国内外不同的检测方法是否会导致水分测定结果差异。使用上述三种方法测定同一大豆样品8平行的水分含量。运用 SPSS 统计分析软件中的配对 t 检验法、单因素方差分析法和多重比较法对结果进行比较分析，确定三种方法的结果均有显著差异。采用加标回收的方法检测三种方法水分的回收率，确定 ASAE 法的回收率最高，用该法测定的大豆水分含量结果最接近于大豆水分的真实值。从仪器安全、资源利用率、检测时间等方面综合考虑，建议优先使用 GB/T 5497-1985法，对样品数量较多时，考虑使用 GAC2100快速仪器法。
연구사용 GB/T 5497-1985법、ASAE 법화 GAC2100쾌속의기법삼충방법대대두중적수분함량진행측정，이학정국내외불동적검측방법시부회도치수분측정결과차이。사용상술삼충방법측정동일대두양품8평행적수분함량。운용 SPSS 통계분석연건중적배대 t 검험법、단인소방차분석법화다중비교법대결과진행비교분석，학정삼충방법적결과균유현저차이。채용가표회수적방법검측삼충방법수분적회수솔，학정 ASAE 법적회수솔최고，용해법측정적대두수분함량결과최접근우대두수분적진실치。종의기안전、자원이용솔、검측시간등방면종합고필，건의우선사용 GB/T 5497-1985법，대양품수량교다시，고필사용 GAC2100쾌속의기법。
This research used GB/T 5497-1985,ASAE and GAC2100 rapid determination method to measure the moisture content in soybeans. Whether different methods may lead to different results were determined. Eight parallel results were measured by three methods. The results were compared by SPSS Statistics using paired sample test,ANOVA and multiple comparisons. Significant differences between the three methods were found. The recoveries of three methods were determined and compared. ASAE method can get the highest recovery. And the result was closest to the true moisture value in soybeans. In consideration of the equipment safety,utilization and efficiency,the priority use of GB/T 5497-1985 was recommended. If the workload is heavy,the use of GAC2100 rapid determination method is recommended.