经济与管理研究
經濟與管理研究
경제여관리연구
RESEARCH ON ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT
2014年
9期
32-42
,共11页
农民工%代际差异%当地型职业流动%迁移型职业流动%留城意愿
農民工%代際差異%噹地型職業流動%遷移型職業流動%留城意願
농민공%대제차이%당지형직업류동%천이형직업류동%류성의원
Migrant Workers%Intergenerational Differences%Local Job Mobility%Migratory Job Mobility%Willingness of Staying in the City
文章利用2003年和2008年两轮城镇住户收入调查数据，对农民工的代际差异从工资收入决定和留城意愿两个维度进行了统计分析、实证检验与时点间的比较。回归结果表明，两代农民工在工资收入决定与留城意愿两个层面并不存在显著的代际差异，农民工整体仍倚重职业流动来提升其收入水平。具体来看，新生代农民工尤其是2008年的新生代农民工具有更高的教育水平，但其教育回报率并不存在显著的代际差异，也没有随时间而“水涨船高”；两代农民工均倚重职业流动来提高其收入水平，在2008年表现得更为突出；两代农民工在两个调查年度均表现出很高的留城意愿；影响农民工留城意愿的因素主要表现为时点差异而非代际差异；迁移型职业流动不利于2008年新生代农民工留城意愿的提高；除城市可提供的收入水平外，养老、医疗等社会事业的发展水平是影响农民工整体是否留在城市的重要因素。
文章利用2003年和2008年兩輪城鎮住戶收入調查數據，對農民工的代際差異從工資收入決定和留城意願兩箇維度進行瞭統計分析、實證檢驗與時點間的比較。迴歸結果錶明，兩代農民工在工資收入決定與留城意願兩箇層麵併不存在顯著的代際差異，農民工整體仍倚重職業流動來提升其收入水平。具體來看，新生代農民工尤其是2008年的新生代農民工具有更高的教育水平，但其教育迴報率併不存在顯著的代際差異，也沒有隨時間而“水漲船高”；兩代農民工均倚重職業流動來提高其收入水平，在2008年錶現得更為突齣；兩代農民工在兩箇調查年度均錶現齣很高的留城意願；影響農民工留城意願的因素主要錶現為時點差異而非代際差異；遷移型職業流動不利于2008年新生代農民工留城意願的提高；除城市可提供的收入水平外，養老、醫療等社會事業的髮展水平是影響農民工整體是否留在城市的重要因素。
문장이용2003년화2008년량륜성진주호수입조사수거，대농민공적대제차이종공자수입결정화류성의원량개유도진행료통계분석、실증검험여시점간적비교。회귀결과표명，량대농민공재공자수입결정여류성의원량개층면병불존재현저적대제차이，농민공정체잉의중직업류동래제승기수입수평。구체래간，신생대농민공우기시2008년적신생대농민공구유경고적교육수평，단기교육회보솔병불존재현저적대제차이，야몰유수시간이“수창선고”；량대농민공균의중직업류동래제고기수입수평，재2008년표현득경위돌출；량대농민공재량개조사년도균표현출흔고적류성의원；영향농민공류성의원적인소주요표현위시점차이이비대제차이；천이형직업류동불리우2008년신생대농민공류성의원적제고；제성시가제공적수입수평외，양로、의료등사회사업적발전수평시영향농민공정체시부류재성시적중요인소。
Based on CHIP data executed in 2003 and 2008,this paper conducts a comparative study on the intergenera-tional differences and time-point differences between the first and second generation of migrant workers by the perspectives of wage determination and willingness of staying in the city.The regression results show that there is no significant difference between two generations in wage determination and willingness of staying in the city,and migrant workers as a whole still heavily rely on job mobility to improve their income level.Specifically,the second generation of migrant workers have higher levels of education,especially in 2008,but there is no significant intergenerational difference on return of education or im-provement over time.Both generations rely on job mobility to raise their income level,which is even more prominent in 2008, without apparent intergenerational differences,also showing high willingness to stay in the city in two survey years.Main fac-tors that affect the migrant workers’willingness to stay in the city show the features of time-point differences rather than in-tergenerational differences.Migratory job mobility do no good for the second generation migrant workers’willingness to stay in the city in 2008.Besides,the income levels of cities,pension,health care and other social undertakings development level are the important factors that affect the whole migrant workers’willingness to stay in the city.
