CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨针对痔疮手术患者，对比采用骶管阻滞以及硬膜外腔阻滞两种方法完成麻醉后的效果表现。方法选取该院2010年09月-2012年09月痔疮手术患者59例，利用随机数表法针对患者完成随机分组，组别名称设为A1组与A2组。针对A1组的30例患者，对其采用骶管阻滞的方法进行麻醉；针对A2组的29例患者，对其采用硬膜外腔阻滞的方法进行麻醉，对比两组患者完成麻醉后的效果表现。结果完成麻醉之后发现，A1组患者完成麻醉后发挥作用的时间显著低于A2组患者（P=0.001）。对两组患者的麻醉效果进行评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。在运动评分方面，A1组患者显著低于A2组患者（P<0.001）。结论针对痔疮手术患者，采用骶管阻滞的方法进行麻醉，最终效果表现良好，针对治疗效果具有显著的促进作用。
목적：탐토침대치창수술환자，대비채용저관조체이급경막외강조체량충방법완성마취후적효과표현。방법선취해원2010년09월-2012년09월치창수술환자59례，이용수궤수표법침대환자완성수궤분조，조별명칭설위A1조여A2조。침대A1조적30례환자，대기채용저관조체적방법진행마취；침대A2조적29례환자，대기채용경막외강조체적방법진행마취，대비량조환자완성마취후적효과표현。결과완성마취지후발현，A1조환자완성마취후발휘작용적시간현저저우A2조환자（P=0.001）。대량조환자적마취효과진행평분차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。재운동평분방면，A1조환자현저저우A2조환자（P<0.001）。결론침대치창수술환자，채용저관조체적방법진행마취，최종효과표현량호，침대치료효과구유현저적촉진작용。
Objective To compare the effect between caudal block and epidural anesthesia for hemorrhoid surgery. Methods 59 cases of patients underwent hemorrhoid surgery in our hospital from September, 2010 to September, 2012 were selected and ran-domly divided into group A1 and group A2 according to the random number table method. Caudal block anesthesia was given to the 30 patients in group A1, and epidural anesthesia was given to the 29 patients in group A2. The anesthesia effect of two groups was compared. Results After the completion of anesthesia, it was found that the duration of anesthesia of group A1 was significant-ly shorter than that of group A2 (P=0.001). It was found eventually that the difference in anesthetic effect score between the two groups of patients was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The sports score of group A1 was significantly lower than that of group A2 (P<0.001). Conclusion For patients with hemorrhoid surgery, the ultimate effect of caudal block anesthesia is better, and which has a significant role in promoting the treatment.