中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
18期
160-161
,共2页
新生儿脐部感染原因%护理进展
新生兒臍部感染原因%護理進展
신생인제부감염원인%호리진전
Causes of newborn umbilical infection%Advances in nursing
目的:探讨新生儿脐部感染的原因,并且研究不同护理方法对新生儿脐部感染的护理效果。方法选自2012年1月-2013年1月在该院出生的新生儿110例,对新生儿脐部感染的原因进行分析,并且将这110例新生儿随机分成两组,每组55例新生儿,分别命名为观察组和对照组。对对照组55例新生儿采取常规护理的方法,对观察组55例新生儿进行护理干预,观察两组新生儿的临床护理效果。结果对照组55例新生儿进行常规护理,临床感染率为27.3%。观察组55例新生儿进行常规护理基础上,进行护理干预,临床感染率为12.7%。两组新生儿的临床感染率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过分析新生儿脐部感染的原因,并且采取有效的护理干预方法,能够减少新生儿脐部感染率,提高护理效果。
目的:探討新生兒臍部感染的原因,併且研究不同護理方法對新生兒臍部感染的護理效果。方法選自2012年1月-2013年1月在該院齣生的新生兒110例,對新生兒臍部感染的原因進行分析,併且將這110例新生兒隨機分成兩組,每組55例新生兒,分彆命名為觀察組和對照組。對對照組55例新生兒採取常規護理的方法,對觀察組55例新生兒進行護理榦預,觀察兩組新生兒的臨床護理效果。結果對照組55例新生兒進行常規護理,臨床感染率為27.3%。觀察組55例新生兒進行常規護理基礎上,進行護理榦預,臨床感染率為12.7%。兩組新生兒的臨床感染率差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論通過分析新生兒臍部感染的原因,併且採取有效的護理榦預方法,能夠減少新生兒臍部感染率,提高護理效果。
목적:탐토신생인제부감염적원인,병차연구불동호리방법대신생인제부감염적호리효과。방법선자2012년1월-2013년1월재해원출생적신생인110례,대신생인제부감염적원인진행분석,병차장저110례신생인수궤분성량조,매조55례신생인,분별명명위관찰조화대조조。대대조조55례신생인채취상규호리적방법,대관찰조55례신생인진행호리간예,관찰량조신생인적림상호리효과。결과대조조55례신생인진행상규호리,림상감염솔위27.3%。관찰조55례신생인진행상규호리기출상,진행호리간예,림상감염솔위12.7%。량조신생인적림상감염솔차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론통과분석신생인제부감염적원인,병차채취유효적호리간예방법,능구감소신생인제부감염솔,제고호리효과。
Objective To investigate the causes of neonatal umbilical infection, and the effect of different ways of nursing on neonatal umbilical infection. Methods 110 neonates born in our hospital from January, 2012 to January, 2013 were selected. The causes of neonatal umbilical infection were analyzed. And the 110 neonates were randomly divided into 2 groups, named as the observation group and the control group, each group of 55 cases of newborns. The 55 cases of neonates in the control group were given conventional nursing, and 55 neonates in the observation group were given nursing intervention. The clinical nursing effect of these two groups of neonates was observed. Results The clinical infection rate of 55 neonates in the control group treated with conventional nursing is 27.3%, and that of the 55 neonates in the observation group treated with nursing intervention on the basis of conventional nursing is 12.7%, the difference between the 2 groups in clinical infection rate is statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusion Through the analysis of neonatal umbilical infection causes and taking effective nursing intervention methods can re-duce the rate of neonatal umbilical infection and improve the effect of nursing.