世界地理研究
世界地理研究
세계지리연구
WORLD REGIONAL STUDIES
2014年
3期
1-11
,共11页
地缘政治经济学%碳关税%CGE%多区域
地緣政治經濟學%碳關稅%CGE%多區域
지연정치경제학%탄관세%CGE%다구역
geopolinomic%carbon tariff%CGE%multi-regional
碳关税是典型的地缘政治经济学问题,对全球各国具有重要的经济与环境影响。采用混合编程方式,开发了面向地缘政治经济分析的全球多区域CGE政策模拟器,并模拟了美国、欧盟对世界其他经济体征收碳关税的影响。模拟结果显示,征收碳关税对发展中国家经济形成了较大的负面冲击,造成其总产出及贸易条件等指标的下降,其中,中国经济受到的负面冲击最大,其矿产加工与冶金、塑料橡胶化工及矿产采掘等部门的产出下降严重,低水平发展中国家受到的负面冲击最小。同时也发现,欧盟从碳关税中的受益要大于美国,这成为其推行碳关税的重要驱动力。在应对碳关税的国际谈判中,中、高经济发展水平的发展中国家是中国的最佳合作伙伴,低水平发展中国家则不是。此外,美国从碳关税中的受益并不明显,是中国有可能争取的合作对象。
碳關稅是典型的地緣政治經濟學問題,對全毬各國具有重要的經濟與環境影響。採用混閤編程方式,開髮瞭麵嚮地緣政治經濟分析的全毬多區域CGE政策模擬器,併模擬瞭美國、歐盟對世界其他經濟體徵收碳關稅的影響。模擬結果顯示,徵收碳關稅對髮展中國傢經濟形成瞭較大的負麵遲擊,造成其總產齣及貿易條件等指標的下降,其中,中國經濟受到的負麵遲擊最大,其礦產加工與冶金、塑料橡膠化工及礦產採掘等部門的產齣下降嚴重,低水平髮展中國傢受到的負麵遲擊最小。同時也髮現,歐盟從碳關稅中的受益要大于美國,這成為其推行碳關稅的重要驅動力。在應對碳關稅的國際談判中,中、高經濟髮展水平的髮展中國傢是中國的最佳閤作夥伴,低水平髮展中國傢則不是。此外,美國從碳關稅中的受益併不明顯,是中國有可能爭取的閤作對象。
탄관세시전형적지연정치경제학문제,대전구각국구유중요적경제여배경영향。채용혼합편정방식,개발료면향지연정치경제분석적전구다구역CGE정책모의기,병모의료미국、구맹대세계기타경제체정수탄관세적영향。모의결과현시,정수탄관세대발전중국가경제형성료교대적부면충격,조성기총산출급무역조건등지표적하강,기중,중국경제수도적부면충격최대,기광산가공여야금、소료상효화공급광산채굴등부문적산출하강엄중,저수평발전중국가수도적부면충격최소。동시야발현,구맹종탄관세중적수익요대우미국,저성위기추행탄관세적중요구동력。재응대탄관세적국제담판중,중、고경제발전수평적발전중국가시중국적최가합작화반,저수평발전중국가칙불시。차외,미국종탄관세중적수익병불명현,시중국유가능쟁취적합작대상。
Carbon tariff is a typically geopolinomic issue and has an economic and environmental influence on the whole world which can not be ignored. By u-tilizing hybrid programming pattern, the authors have built a global multi-re-gional Computable General Equilibrium modeling system, which could be used in the analysis of global geopolinomic issues. Based on the CGE simulator devel-oped, the impact of the carbon tariff policy has been analyzed, and the exoge-nous shock is set as carbon tariff imposed on the developing countries by the United States and European Union. The simulation result shows that most of the developing countries are suffered quite a certain passive influence, with a decrease of output, terms of trade and other economic indexes. The economy of China will suffer the most serious loss among these developing countries, with a drastic drop in the output of mineral processing and metallurgy, plastics and rubber industry, mineral extractionand, and so on. By contrast, the loss of the low-lever developing countries is not very significant. The simulation result also shows that under such scenario setting, EU will benefit much more than US, which may explain the enthusiasm of EU in carrying out the carbon tariff policy. In the negotiation of countering the carbon tariff policy of the developed countries, the high-lever and mid-level developing countries can be regarded as the appropriate partners of China for their common geopolinomic interest, while the low-lever developing countries will probably not ally with China to oppose the carbon tariff policy imposed by the developed countries. It is worth noting that US can possibly be courted by China, since US benefit little from the carbon tariff policy as a matter of fact.