安徽卫生职业技术学院学报
安徽衛生職業技術學院學報
안휘위생직업기술학원학보
JOURNAL OF ANHUI HEALTH VOCATIONAL & TECHNICAL COLLEGE
2014年
4期
50-51
,共2页
子宫肌瘤%腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除%射频消融%微创技术
子宮肌瘤%腹腔鏡下子宮肌瘤剔除%射頻消融%微創技術
자궁기류%복강경하자궁기류척제%사빈소융%미창기술
Uterine fibroida%Laparoscopic myonectomy%Radiofrequency abation%Minimally invasive
目的：探讨不同术式子宫肌瘤剔除术优缺点。方法：回顾性分析某医院60例子宫肌瘤患者的临床资料，比较两组腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除（LM）组射频消融子宫肌瘤（RFA）组。手术时间、术中出血、术后恢复、术后病率、有效率差异进行分析。结果：两组比较，RFA组手术时间短，术中出血少，术后肠功能恢复快，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后病率、术后治愈率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论：腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除与射频消融治疗子宫肌瘤都保全子宫的微创治疗。射频消融治疗子宫肌瘤的患者，损伤小，出血少。两种术式各自有其优缺点，治疗效果与腹腔镜下肌瘤剔除无差异，值得临床推广。
目的：探討不同術式子宮肌瘤剔除術優缺點。方法：迴顧性分析某醫院60例子宮肌瘤患者的臨床資料，比較兩組腹腔鏡下子宮肌瘤剔除（LM）組射頻消融子宮肌瘤（RFA）組。手術時間、術中齣血、術後恢複、術後病率、有效率差異進行分析。結果：兩組比較，RFA組手術時間短，術中齣血少，術後腸功能恢複快，差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組術後病率、術後治愈率差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論：腹腔鏡下子宮肌瘤剔除與射頻消融治療子宮肌瘤都保全子宮的微創治療。射頻消融治療子宮肌瘤的患者，損傷小，齣血少。兩種術式各自有其優缺點，治療效果與腹腔鏡下肌瘤剔除無差異，值得臨床推廣。
목적：탐토불동술식자궁기류척제술우결점。방법：회고성분석모의원60례자궁기류환자적림상자료，비교량조복강경하자궁기류척제（LM）조사빈소융자궁기류（RFA）조。수술시간、술중출혈、술후회복、술후병솔、유효솔차이진행분석。결과：량조비교，RFA조수술시간단，술중출혈소，술후장공능회복쾌，차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조술후병솔、술후치유솔차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론：복강경하자궁기류척제여사빈소융치료자궁기류도보전자궁적미창치료。사빈소융치료자궁기류적환자，손상소，출혈소。량충술식각자유기우결점，치료효과여복강경하기류척제무차이，치득림상추엄。
Objective:To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different myomectomy.Methods:The clin-ical data of 60 patients with myoma of uterus Medicine were retrospectively analysed.We analysed the differences of operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative recovery postoperative morbidity,efficiency.It is to compared with laparoscopic myomectomy (LM)and radivfrequency ablation (RFA) of yterine fibroids.Results:RFA is less bleeding, has shorter of operative time,is faster of postoperative recovery of intestinal function than LM, the difference is statisti-cally significant(P<0.05). The postoperative morbidity of RFA and qperation the cur rate of RFA,there are no statisti-cally significant (P>0.05).Conclusion:Both LM and RFA are minimally invasive treatment methods for preservation of the uterus.RFA is own of advantages of less injury,less bleeding,and it is worth to be popularized.
