敦煌研究
敦煌研究
돈황연구
DUNHUANG RESEARCH
2014年
4期
54-64
,共11页
法藏敦煌文书 P.2942%尚衡%杨志烈%杨休明
法藏敦煌文書 P.2942%尚衡%楊誌烈%楊休明
법장돈황문서 P.2942%상형%양지렬%양휴명
P. 2942 collected in France%Shang Heng%Yang Zhilie%Yang Xiuming
法藏敦煌文书 P.2942为唐代吐蕃占领河陇之际的官方文书,其中的“尚书”,“使主”,“副帅”,“元帅”为同一人,但并非杨志烈或杨休明,而是崔汉衡墓志所记“俄属艰难,春官卿尚衡总戎河右”之句中的礼部尚书尚衡。周逸勾结回纥杀害尚衡,乃周逸与当时的唐朝叛臣仆固怀恩彼此串通合谋的结果。建中元年十二月尚衡能增列忠义表绝非偶然,这进一步说明他的事迹在没有得到西域消息时,很长一段时间是不为唐朝廷所知或认可的。文书应该为尚衡与杨休明先后以河西节度使的身份主持河西军政时的判文,后经判官、录事、掌书记一类的文职人员抄写誊清后作为政府备案的档案幸存下来,其命名应该为《河西节度观察使判牒集》;文书反映的史事应该是在大历元年(766)六月至八、九月间。
法藏敦煌文書 P.2942為唐代吐蕃佔領河隴之際的官方文書,其中的“尚書”,“使主”,“副帥”,“元帥”為同一人,但併非楊誌烈或楊休明,而是崔漢衡墓誌所記“俄屬艱難,春官卿尚衡總戎河右”之句中的禮部尚書尚衡。週逸勾結迴紇殺害尚衡,迺週逸與噹時的唐朝叛臣僕固懷恩彼此串通閤謀的結果。建中元年十二月尚衡能增列忠義錶絕非偶然,這進一步說明他的事跡在沒有得到西域消息時,很長一段時間是不為唐朝廷所知或認可的。文書應該為尚衡與楊休明先後以河西節度使的身份主持河西軍政時的判文,後經判官、錄事、掌書記一類的文職人員抄寫謄清後作為政府備案的檔案倖存下來,其命名應該為《河西節度觀察使判牒集》;文書反映的史事應該是在大歷元年(766)六月至八、九月間。
법장돈황문서 P.2942위당대토번점령하롱지제적관방문서,기중적“상서”,“사주”,“부수”,“원수”위동일인,단병비양지렬혹양휴명,이시최한형묘지소기“아속간난,춘관경상형총융하우”지구중적례부상서상형。주일구결회흘살해상형,내주일여당시적당조반신부고부은피차천통합모적결과。건중원년십이월상형능증렬충의표절비우연,저진일보설명타적사적재몰유득도서역소식시,흔장일단시간시불위당조정소지혹인가적。문서응해위상형여양휴명선후이하서절도사적신빈주지하서군정시적판문,후경판관、록사、장서기일류적문직인원초사등청후작위정부비안적당안행존하래,기명명응해위《하서절도관찰사판첩집》;문서반영적사사응해시재대역원년(766)륙월지팔、구월간。
P. 2942 is an official document dated to a period of the Tang dynasty when the Helong area was occupied by the Tibetans. The titles “Shangshu,” “Shizhu,” “Fushuai,” and “Yuanshui” therein refer to a single person: not Yang Zhilie, nor Yang Xiuming, but Shang Heng, the minister of rituals recorded in Cui Hanheng’s epitaph. As a result of Zhouyi’s collusion with Pugu Huai’en, a rebellious official of the Tang dynasty, Zhou Yi collaborated with the Uighurs to kill Shang Heng. It was not accidental that Shang Heng was included on a list of “loyal persons” in December of the second year of Jianzhong era, which suggests that Shang Heng had not been recognized by Tang officials for a long time before the message about his death reached the Tang court. The manuscript is presumed to be a judicial record produced to document that Shang Heng and Yang Xiuming successively took charge of the army and government of Hexi as Hexi Commander;the manuscript was later transcribed for government archives. It should therefore be named Collection of Judicial Documents of the Commander and Surveillance Commissioner in Hexi, the events it records should have taken place between June and August or September in the first year of the Dali era (766 CE).