哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）
哈爾濱工業大學學報（社會科學版）
합이빈공업대학학보（사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION)
2014年
5期
1-20
,共20页
给付行政%裁量%准则%功能性责任%组织内裁量%相对性
給付行政%裁量%準則%功能性責任%組織內裁量%相對性
급부행정%재량%준칙%공능성책임%조직내재량%상대성
Leistende Verwaltung%discretion%criterion%functional responsibility%intra-organi-zational discretion%relativity
讨论法治思维、法治政府评价的问题，就离不开对行政裁量的考察。考察行政裁量的本质论，就不能绕开对要件裁量说和效果裁量说这种两分法的再认识。探讨自由(便宜)裁量和羁束(法规)裁量的区别问题，不仅有助于把握行政裁量司法统制的界限和基准，而且有助于促进法规范的制定和解释之完善。结合给付行政的增大和裁量权的扩展这种世界性发展趋势，在给付行政领域建构符合该领域特点和规律性的行政责任论，裁量规制和裁量机制本身的完善必不可少。在具有较强裁量性的给付行政领域，宜进行功能性、程序法性的合目的性裁量，而运用和“羁束裁量行为”相对应意义以外的“自由裁量行为”观念，则是不适宜的。在给付行政领域，需要根据每个受给者的具体情形展开具有针对性的、各种各样的灵活应对，这种特点决定了该领域的裁量需要更广阔的空间，同时也需要完善相应的程序和准则，确立基层工作人员状况判断的优位等独具特色的权力运用规则，重视和强调规制手段的活用。
討論法治思維、法治政府評價的問題，就離不開對行政裁量的攷察。攷察行政裁量的本質論，就不能繞開對要件裁量說和效果裁量說這種兩分法的再認識。探討自由(便宜)裁量和羈束(法規)裁量的區彆問題，不僅有助于把握行政裁量司法統製的界限和基準，而且有助于促進法規範的製定和解釋之完善。結閤給付行政的增大和裁量權的擴展這種世界性髮展趨勢，在給付行政領域建構符閤該領域特點和規律性的行政責任論，裁量規製和裁量機製本身的完善必不可少。在具有較彊裁量性的給付行政領域，宜進行功能性、程序法性的閤目的性裁量，而運用和“羈束裁量行為”相對應意義以外的“自由裁量行為”觀唸，則是不適宜的。在給付行政領域，需要根據每箇受給者的具體情形展開具有針對性的、各種各樣的靈活應對，這種特點決定瞭該領域的裁量需要更廣闊的空間，同時也需要完善相應的程序和準則，確立基層工作人員狀況判斷的優位等獨具特色的權力運用規則，重視和彊調規製手段的活用。
토론법치사유、법치정부평개적문제，취리불개대행정재량적고찰。고찰행정재량적본질론，취불능요개대요건재량설화효과재량설저충량분법적재인식。탐토자유(편의)재량화기속(법규)재량적구별문제，불부유조우파악행정재량사법통제적계한화기준，이차유조우촉진법규범적제정화해석지완선。결합급부행정적증대화재량권적확전저충세계성발전추세，재급부행정영역건구부합해영역특점화규률성적행정책임론，재량규제화재량궤제본신적완선필불가소。재구유교강재량성적급부행정영역，의진행공능성、정서법성적합목적성재량，이운용화“기속재량행위”상대응의의이외적“자유재량행위”관념，칙시불괄의적。재급부행정영역，수요근거매개수급자적구체정형전개구유침대성적、각충각양적령활응대，저충특점결정료해영역적재량수요경엄활적공간，동시야수요완선상응적정서화준칙，학립기층공작인원상황판단적우위등독구특색적권력운용규칙，중시화강조규제수단적활용。
Discussion on the rule of law thinking,law-based government evaluation questions,it is not separate from the study of administrative discretion.On the study of the nature of administra-tive discretion,we can not bypass the recognition of dichotomy method between the Theory of Discre-tion of Legal Elements and the Theory of Discretion of Legal Effect.Exploring the difference between free (facilitate)discretion and restrictive (statutory)discretion,not only helps to grasp the limits and criterion of j udicial control on administrative discretion,but also helps to improve the formulation and interpretation of legal norms.Combined with the global development trend of the increased Leistende Verwaltung and the extension of discretion,we should establish the theory of administrative responsi-bility that meets the characteristics and laws in the area of Leistende Verwaltung ,it is indispensable to improve the regulation of discretion and discretionary mechanisms.Leistende Verwaltung is an area with a strong discretionary nature.Thus,it is better to apply the purposive discretion that is function-al and procedural,while the free discretion which is not corresponding to restrictive discretion is not appropriate.In the area of Leistende Verwaltung ,various flexible responses with pertinence should be given according to the specific situation of each affected person.This feature determines discretion in this area needs a broader space,but also need to complete the appropriate procedures and guidelines to establish grass-roots staff to determine the priority of the situation,such as the use of rules u-nique powers,and stress the importance of utilizing regulation means.
