吉林医学
吉林醫學
길림의학
JILIN MEDICAL JOURANL
2014年
25期
5572-5573
,共2页
王彬彬%赵志欣%杨俊美
王彬彬%趙誌訢%楊俊美
왕빈빈%조지흔%양준미
抑郁症%文拉法辛缓释片%认知疗法
抑鬱癥%文拉法辛緩釋片%認知療法
억욱증%문랍법신완석편%인지요법
Depression%Venlafaxine sustained release tablet%Cognitive therapy
目的:评价文拉法辛缓释片联合认知疗法治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法:48例抑郁症患者随机分成两组,对照组使用文拉法辛缓释片治疗,联合组采用文拉法辛缓释片联合认知疗法治疗,疗程为6周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表( HAMD-24)和药物不良反应评定疗效及安全性。结果:治疗2周末,两组HAMD评分比较差异无统计学意义( P﹥0.05)。治疗4周末、6周末两组HAMD评分比较差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。治疗6周末两组药物剂量比较差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论:文拉法辛缓释片联合认知疗法治疗抑郁症的临床疗效好,药物剂量低。
目的:評價文拉法辛緩釋片聯閤認知療法治療抑鬱癥的療效和安全性。方法:48例抑鬱癥患者隨機分成兩組,對照組使用文拉法辛緩釋片治療,聯閤組採用文拉法辛緩釋片聯閤認知療法治療,療程為6週。採用漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶( HAMD-24)和藥物不良反應評定療效及安全性。結果:治療2週末,兩組HAMD評分比較差異無統計學意義( P﹥0.05)。治療4週末、6週末兩組HAMD評分比較差異有統計學意義(P﹤0.05)。治療6週末兩組藥物劑量比較差異有統計學意義(P﹤0.05)。結論:文拉法辛緩釋片聯閤認知療法治療抑鬱癥的臨床療效好,藥物劑量低。
목적:평개문랍법신완석편연합인지요법치료억욱증적료효화안전성。방법:48례억욱증환자수궤분성량조,대조조사용문랍법신완석편치료,연합조채용문랍법신완석편연합인지요법치료,료정위6주。채용한밀이돈억욱량표( HAMD-24)화약물불량반응평정료효급안전성。결과:치료2주말,량조HAMD평분비교차이무통계학의의( P﹥0.05)。치료4주말、6주말량조HAMD평분비교차이유통계학의의(P﹤0.05)。치료6주말량조약물제량비교차이유통계학의의(P﹤0.05)。결론:문랍법신완석편연합인지요법치료억욱증적림상료효호,약물제량저。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine sustained release tablet combined with cognitive therapy in the treatment of depression. Method 48 patients with depression were randomly divided into two groups. The control group was treated with venlafaxine sustained release tablet and the combination group was treated with venlafaxine sustained release tablet as well as cognitive ther-apy for 6 weeks. Using the Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD - 24)and the adverse drug reactions to assess the efficacy and safety of both therapies. Results The HAMD scores of two groups had no significant difference after treatment for 2 weeks( P﹥0. 05 ). After treat-ment for 4 or 6 weeks,there was significant difference of HAMD scores between two groups(P﹤0. 05). The drug dosage of two groups had significant difference after treatment for 6 weeks( P ﹤0. 05 ). Conclusion Venlafaxine sustained release tablet combined with cognitive therapy can enhance the clinical curative effect of depression and low dose of drug was only needed.