CAJ | 학술논문

马克思早期的“异化”范畴带有浓厚的抽象人本学色彩，而后期的“物象化”范畴更符合历史唯物主义的原则，更能彰显当下的历史现实，即社会关系的全面异化。按照卢卡奇的逻辑，社会关系的全面异化呈现出更为深刻的意识形态性质，一个显豁状况是人的生存呈现为“拟真”的“物象化”世界。身体哲学理论所彰显的主体间性逻辑有力回应了新的意识形态批判课题，而马克思交往理论同样蕴含着主体间性哲学视域，为当代人类社会走出这种生存困境提供一条可能路径。
마극사조기적“이화”범주대유농후적추상인본학색채，이후기적“물상화”범주경부합역사유물주의적원칙，경능창현당하적역사현실，즉사회관계적전면이화。안조로잡기적라집，사회관계적전면이화정현출경위심각적의식형태성질，일개현활상황시인적생존정현위“의진”적“물상화”세계。신체철학이론소창현적주체간성라집유력회응료신적의식형태비판과제，이마극사교왕이론동양온함착주체간성철학시역，위당대인류사회주출저충생존곤경제공일조가능로경。
Marx’s early“alienation” category is highly humanistic, while the later“reification”category is better in line with the principle of historical materialism. It can better reveal the historical reality, namely, the alienation of social relations. According to Lukacs’s logic, a much more profound ideological nature can be presented comprehensively through the overall alienation of social relations. A clear and bright condition is that human’s living takes on a “true” “reification” world. Inter-subjective logic in body philosophy is regarded as an effective response to the criticism of new ideology. This inter-subjectivity philosophy is also contained in Marx’s communication theory, which might provide a way for the contemporary human society to get out of this living plight.