CAJ | 학술논문

伊藤仁斋与荻生徂徕是日本德川时期古学派的两位代表人物。他们在思想上既有相似性，更有差异性。他们在复古对象的选择上存在着重大区别：仁斋推崇孔子和孟子，认为《论语》和《孟子》是一切学问的根基；徂徕则贬斥孔孟，将古代七位圣王(尧、舜、禹、汤、文、武、周)推向至高无上的“圣人”地位，同时认为记录“圣王之道”的六经高于《论语》和《孟子》。导致这种差别的诸多因素中，既有两位学者对中国古代圣贤、儒家经典的不同理解与诠释，也有他们对德川时期社会现实的不同体会，以及各自建立新学派的需要。
이등인재여적생조래시일본덕천시기고학파적량위대표인물。타문재사상상기유상사성，경유차이성。타문재복고대상적선택상존재착중대구별：인재추숭공자화맹자，인위《론어》화《맹자》시일절학문적근기；조래칙폄척공맹，장고대칠위골왕(요、순、우、탕、문、무、주)추향지고무상적“골인”지위，동시인위기록“골왕지도”적육경고우《론어》화《맹자》。도치저충차별적제다인소중，기유량위학자대중국고대골현、유가경전적불동리해여전석，야유타문대덕천시기사회현실적불동체회，이급각자건립신학파적수요。
There are a number of similarities and differences in the Confucian ideas between ItōJinsai and OgyūSorai,both of who were the distinguishing Confucian scholars of Ancient-learning school in Tokugawa Japan.The restoration of Confucian-ism was acted in two different ways:Jinsai respects Confucius and Mencius,thinking highly of Analects and Mencius as the foundation of all the scholarship,while Sorai regarded the seven ancient kings as the sages,insisting that Six Classics which re-corded the real society in ancient kings’time are superior to Analects and Mencius.The discrepancy between Jinsai and Sorai’ s selections were due to their different understanding of the Confucian classics,figures,social realities and the needs to build up new Confucian schools.