CAJ | 학술논문

以德国帕特伯恩大学校园网英文问卷调查、专家访谈、个案专家，以及多输入加权优序图等方法建立了全球化背景下竞技体育强国的评价标准，并以“夏冬奥运平等”指标对国际公认的竞技强国和中国的现状进行研究，结果发现“夏冬奥运不平等”和“奥运金牌至上”的中国竞技发展战略与国际竞技强国评价标准不甚吻合，而且性别差异特别明显，此情可能使中国竞技远离全球化背景下的竞技体育强国之路。
이덕국파특백은대학교완망영문문권조사、전가방담、개안전가，이급다수입가권우서도등방법건립료전구화배경하경기체육강국적평개표준，병이“하동오운평등”지표대국제공인적경기강국화중국적현상진행연구，결과발현“하동오운불평등”화“오운금패지상”적중국경기발전전략여국제경기강국평개표준불심문합，이차성별차이특별명현，차정가능사중국경기원리전구화배경하적경기체육강국지로。
An assessment of “G+3S”for a sports giant was made by means of an internet questionnaire,expert in-terviews,and the Multiple-input Weighted Precedence Chart. and criteria for evaluating a sports giant against the in-ternational background were built. The status quo of competitive sports in internationally recognized sports giant countries and China were studied and compared against the criteria of a balance between the Summer and Winter Games in terms of gender and medals. It was found that the Chinese strategy for competitive sports development, which pursues an imbalance between the Summer Games and its winter version,and gold medal supremacy,do not conform to the criteria for a strong sports nation. Moreover, there existed an apparent gender inequity. The study drew the conclusion that this situation may draw China?s competitive sports further astray from the road to a sports giant with weak competitiveness in world mega-sports events.