中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2013年
23期
4-7
,共4页
潘胜茂%周英%严夏舒%张欢%任雅欣%林伟权
潘勝茂%週英%嚴夏舒%張歡%任雅訢%林偉權
반성무%주영%엄하서%장환%임아흔%림위권
精神疾病%歧视%信度%效度%心理测量学研究
精神疾病%歧視%信度%效度%心理測量學研究
정신질병%기시%신도%효도%심리측량학연구
Mental illness%Discrimination%Reliability%Validity%Psychometric studies
目的 修订、引进归因问卷-27,并评价其在医学生群体中应用的信度和效度.方法 采用标准翻译/回译的方法将归因问卷-27英文版翻译成中文版,整群抽取在广州市某医科大学5个班的学生共230人,用归因问卷-27中文版进行测评,间隔1周后,选取30人进行重测,对量表的因子结构、信度和效度进行检验.结果 中文版归因问卷-27总Cronbach α系数是0.82,各个因子的Cronbachα系数是0.55 ~0.84,量表总的重测信度为0.77,各因子的重测信度为0.61~0.81.由6个因素构成责任归因模型的各项拟合指数分别为x2/df=3,GFI=0.925,NFI=0.880,CFI=0.856,IFI=0.761,RMSEA=0.094,由3个因素组成的危险归因模型的各项拟合指数为x2/df=1.773,GFI=0.959,NFI=0.941,CFI=0.973,IFI=0.973,RMSEA=0.058.路径分析结果支持原有的理论假设.结论 修订版归因问卷-27中文版在医学生中具有较好的信效度,可用于测评医学生对精神分裂症患者的态度.
目的 脩訂、引進歸因問捲-27,併評價其在醫學生群體中應用的信度和效度.方法 採用標準翻譯/迴譯的方法將歸因問捲-27英文版翻譯成中文版,整群抽取在廣州市某醫科大學5箇班的學生共230人,用歸因問捲-27中文版進行測評,間隔1週後,選取30人進行重測,對量錶的因子結構、信度和效度進行檢驗.結果 中文版歸因問捲-27總Cronbach α繫數是0.82,各箇因子的Cronbachα繫數是0.55 ~0.84,量錶總的重測信度為0.77,各因子的重測信度為0.61~0.81.由6箇因素構成責任歸因模型的各項擬閤指數分彆為x2/df=3,GFI=0.925,NFI=0.880,CFI=0.856,IFI=0.761,RMSEA=0.094,由3箇因素組成的危險歸因模型的各項擬閤指數為x2/df=1.773,GFI=0.959,NFI=0.941,CFI=0.973,IFI=0.973,RMSEA=0.058.路徑分析結果支持原有的理論假設.結論 脩訂版歸因問捲-27中文版在醫學生中具有較好的信效度,可用于測評醫學生對精神分裂癥患者的態度.
목적 수정、인진귀인문권-27,병평개기재의학생군체중응용적신도화효도.방법 채용표준번역/회역적방법장귀인문권-27영문판번역성중문판,정군추취재엄주시모의과대학5개반적학생공230인,용귀인문권-27중문판진행측평,간격1주후,선취30인진행중측,대량표적인자결구、신도화효도진행검험.결과 중문판귀인문권-27총Cronbach α계수시0.82,각개인자적Cronbachα계수시0.55 ~0.84,량표총적중측신도위0.77,각인자적중측신도위0.61~0.81.유6개인소구성책임귀인모형적각항의합지수분별위x2/df=3,GFI=0.925,NFI=0.880,CFI=0.856,IFI=0.761,RMSEA=0.094,유3개인소조성적위험귀인모형적각항의합지수위x2/df=1.773,GFI=0.959,NFI=0.941,CFI=0.973,IFI=0.973,RMSEA=0.058.로경분석결과지지원유적이론가설.결론 수정판귀인문권-27중문판재의학생중구유교호적신효도,가용우측평의학생대정신분렬증환자적태도.
Objective To develop the Chinese version of Attribution Questionnaire-27 and examine its replicability,reliability and validity.Methods The questionnaire was translated using the standard translation/back-translation method and examine its replicability,reliability and validity in 230 medical students who were selected by convenient method.Results The Cronbach α coefficient for Attribution Questionnaire-27 was 0.82 and ranging between 0.55 and 0.84 for the subscales.The test-retest reliabilities of the total scale was 0.77 and the subscales was between 0.61 to 0.81 after one week.Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the hypothesized six factors attribution of responsibility model (x2/df=3,GFI=0.925,NFI=0.880,CFI=0.856,IFI=0.761,RMSEA=0.094) and three factors dangerous model (x2/df=1.773,GFI=0.959,NFI=0.941,CFI=0.973,IFI=0.973,RMSEA=0.058).The path analysis results support the existing theoretical assumptions.Condusions The Chinese version of Attribution Questionnaire-27 has good reliability and validity and can be used in medical student.