CAJ | 학술논문

刑事司法实践中“一捕到底”、“久押不决”、“不当羁押”等现象时有发生，严重背离了羁押的初衷，侵害了被羁押人的合法权利。修改后的刑诉法在对现行羁押措施进行重新审视之余，确立羁押必要性审查制度，承继了尊重和保障人权的刑事诉讼原则，填补了我国在羁押救济规则方面的立法空白，强化了检察机关对诉讼活动的法律监督，防止超期羁押和不当羁押的发生，也有力地保障了被羁押人的合法权益。但是，新刑诉法过于原则性的规定，制约了捕后羁押必要性审查的实际操作，使其成为毫无强制力和生命力的“摆设”。因此，无论是从被羁押人权利保障的角度，还是从公安司法机关权力相互制约的角度，都需要对捕后羁押必要性审查机制进行严密的设计，以增强该机制的司法适用功效。
형사사법실천중“일포도저”、“구압불결”、“불당기압”등현상시유발생，엄중배리료기압적초충，침해료피기압인적합법권리。수개후적형소법재대현행기압조시진행중신심시지여，학립기압필요성심사제도，승계료존중화보장인권적형사소송원칙，전보료아국재기압구제규칙방면적입법공백，강화료검찰궤관대소송활동적법률감독，방지초기기압화불당기압적발생，야유력지보장료피기압인적합법권익。단시，신형소법과우원칙성적규정，제약료포후기압필요성심사적실제조작，사기성위호무강제력화생명력적“파설”。인차，무론시종피기압인권리보장적각도，환시종공안사법궤관권력상호제약적각도，도수요대포후기압필요성심사궤제진행엄밀적설계，이증강해궤제적사법괄용공효。
In criminal law practice, phenomena such as “prolonged custody”, “custody without judgment” and“inappropriate custody” occasionally occur, which go against the original purpose of custody and violate personal legal rights. Besides reexamining custody measures, the new Code of Criminal Procedure establishes the necessity examination mechanism, according to the legal principle of respecting and guaranteeing human rights. It fills the blanks in China’s custody relief rules, strengthens the procuratorate’s legal supervision of litigation activities, prevents overdue and inappropriate custodies, and guarantees personal legal rights. But the principles formulated by The new Code of Criminal Procedure lack applicability for examination practice. Therefore in order to either protect personal rights or mutually restrain public security and judicial powers, it is necessary to devise concrete examination measures to enhance the law’s applicability and effect.