中国介入心脏病学杂志
中國介入心髒病學雜誌
중국개입심장병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
2014年
8期
505-508
,共4页
尹绍侠%吴文丽%于红梅%范东娜%昝朝霞
尹紹俠%吳文麗%于紅梅%範東娜%昝朝霞
윤소협%오문려%우홍매%범동나%잠조하
心房颤动%非瓣膜性%健康教育%规范性%抗凝
心房顫動%非瓣膜性%健康教育%規範性%抗凝
심방전동%비판막성%건강교육%규범성%항응
Atrial fibrillation%Nonvalvular%Health education%Benchmarking%Anticoagulation
目的:研究不同的健康教育对非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者规范性抗凝的影响。方法用数字表法将确诊的NVAF患者400例随机分为对照组和研究组各200例,记录基本资料,均给予常规宣教和治疗。将研究组随机均分为两个亚组,对知识讲座组患者和(或)家属进行心房颤动、华法林抗凝、用药方法、注意事项知识讲座和交流,知识手册组发放相关知识手册。分析研究组和对照组以及两个亚组间12个月后规范性抗凝、缺血性卒中、其他动脉栓塞、大出血、微量出血、死亡等方面的差异,比较两亚组资源耗费的差异。结果(1)研究组规范性抗凝率(40.53%)高于对照组(15.96%)(χ2=28.11,P<0.01)。研究组缺血性卒中率(2.63%)低于对照组(7.45%)(χ2=4.49, P<0.05)。两组间动脉栓塞率、大出血率、微量出血率、死亡率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)知识讲座组人均花费时间[(10.8±1.0)min]比知识手册组[(1.0±0.5)min]长(P<0.01),知识手册组人均成本[(5.1±1.1)元]比知识讲座组[(1.8±0.5)元]高(P<0.01)。(3)12个月后知识讲座组规范性抗凝率(47.96%)高于知识手册组(32.61%)(χ2=7.33,P<0.01),两组缺血性卒中、其他动脉栓塞、大出血、微出血、死亡率等比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论详尽、正确的抗凝教育和指导能提高NVAF患者规范性抗凝率,并减少患者缺血性卒中的发生率。知识讲座的教育方式耗费时间更长,但更能提高患者的规范性抗凝率,为建立心房颤动规范的管理模式提供了理论依据。
目的:研究不同的健康教育對非瓣膜性心房顫動(NVAF)患者規範性抗凝的影響。方法用數字錶法將確診的NVAF患者400例隨機分為對照組和研究組各200例,記錄基本資料,均給予常規宣教和治療。將研究組隨機均分為兩箇亞組,對知識講座組患者和(或)傢屬進行心房顫動、華法林抗凝、用藥方法、註意事項知識講座和交流,知識手冊組髮放相關知識手冊。分析研究組和對照組以及兩箇亞組間12箇月後規範性抗凝、缺血性卒中、其他動脈栓塞、大齣血、微量齣血、死亡等方麵的差異,比較兩亞組資源耗費的差異。結果(1)研究組規範性抗凝率(40.53%)高于對照組(15.96%)(χ2=28.11,P<0.01)。研究組缺血性卒中率(2.63%)低于對照組(7.45%)(χ2=4.49, P<0.05)。兩組間動脈栓塞率、大齣血率、微量齣血率、死亡率比較,差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。(2)知識講座組人均花費時間[(10.8±1.0)min]比知識手冊組[(1.0±0.5)min]長(P<0.01),知識手冊組人均成本[(5.1±1.1)元]比知識講座組[(1.8±0.5)元]高(P<0.01)。(3)12箇月後知識講座組規範性抗凝率(47.96%)高于知識手冊組(32.61%)(χ2=7.33,P<0.01),兩組缺血性卒中、其他動脈栓塞、大齣血、微齣血、死亡率等比較,差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論詳儘、正確的抗凝教育和指導能提高NVAF患者規範性抗凝率,併減少患者缺血性卒中的髮生率。知識講座的教育方式耗費時間更長,但更能提高患者的規範性抗凝率,為建立心房顫動規範的管理模式提供瞭理論依據。
목적:연구불동적건강교육대비판막성심방전동(NVAF)환자규범성항응적영향。방법용수자표법장학진적NVAF환자400례수궤분위대조조화연구조각200례,기록기본자료,균급여상규선교화치료。장연구조수궤균분위량개아조,대지식강좌조환자화(혹)가속진행심방전동、화법림항응、용약방법、주의사항지식강좌화교류,지식수책조발방상관지식수책。분석연구조화대조조이급량개아조간12개월후규범성항응、결혈성졸중、기타동맥전새、대출혈、미량출혈、사망등방면적차이,비교량아조자원모비적차이。결과(1)연구조규범성항응솔(40.53%)고우대조조(15.96%)(χ2=28.11,P<0.01)。연구조결혈성졸중솔(2.63%)저우대조조(7.45%)(χ2=4.49, P<0.05)。량조간동맥전새솔、대출혈솔、미량출혈솔、사망솔비교,차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。(2)지식강좌조인균화비시간[(10.8±1.0)min]비지식수책조[(1.0±0.5)min]장(P<0.01),지식수책조인균성본[(5.1±1.1)원]비지식강좌조[(1.8±0.5)원]고(P<0.01)。(3)12개월후지식강좌조규범성항응솔(47.96%)고우지식수책조(32.61%)(χ2=7.33,P<0.01),량조결혈성졸중、기타동맥전새、대출혈、미출혈、사망솔등비교,차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론상진、정학적항응교육화지도능제고NVAF환자규범성항응솔,병감소환자결혈성졸중적발생솔。지식강좌적교육방식모비시간경장,단경능제고환자적규범성항응솔,위건립심방전동규범적관리모식제공료이론의거。
Objective To explore the Influence of different health education approaches to standard anticoagulation of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods 400 patients with NVAF were randomly divided into the research group (n=200) and the control group (n=200). Baseline clinical information was recorded. Both groups were given regular education and treatment. The control group was randomly divided into two subgroups. One subgroup (patients or/and family members) was given knowledge lectures of atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation anticoagulant, and application of warfarin. The other was given the knowledge through booklets. Standard anticoagulation fulfillment rate, ischemic stroke, other events of artery embolism, major bleeding, minor bleeding and death in the two groups were observed after 1 year. The cost for different education approaches was also compared between the 2 subgroups. Results (1)In the research group, standard anticoagulation fullfillment rate (40.53%) was higher than that of the control group(15.96%) (P<0.01). The rate of ischemic stroke (2.63%) was also lower than the control group (4.49%) (χ2=4.49, P<0.05). The death rate was lower in the research group than those in the control group, but minor bleeding rate was higher, without statistically significance (P>0.05).Other artery embolism rate , major bleeding, minor bleeding, death rate had no statistical difference. (2)Knowledge lecture group (10.8±1.0 min) spend more time than the booklet group (1.0±0.5 min) (P<0.01). The booklet group (5.1±1.1 yuan) costed more in terms of money than the knowledge lecture group (1.8±0.5 yuan) (P<0.01). (3)The knowledge lecture group showed higher standard anticoagulation fulfillment rate (47.96%) than that of booklet group (32.60%) (χ2=7.33, P<0.01). There was no statistical difference in ischemic stroke rate, other artery embolism rate, major bleeding rate, minor bleeding rate and the death rate. Conclusions Detailed, correct anticoagulant education and guidance can improve NVAF patients with standard anticoagulation, and reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Knowledge lecture consumes more time but can improve the standard anticoagulation fulfillment rate.