海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
13期
1903-1905
,共3页
体外反搏%糖尿病肾病%血糖%尿糖
體外反搏%糖尿病腎病%血糖%尿糖
체외반박%당뇨병신병%혈당%뇨당
Enhanced external counterpulsation%Diabetic nephropathy%Blood glucose%Urine glucose
目的:观察增强型体外反搏治疗糖尿病患者的疗效。方法从惠东县人民医院选取160例糖尿病肾病患者,根据治疗方法分为对照组和观察组各80例,对照组采用普通药物治疗,观察组采用普通药物联合增强型体外反搏治疗,对两组患者的血糖水平及其尿糖含量进行检测并统计分析。结果对照组患者治疗后的血糖平均水平为(7.43±3.1) mmol/L,血糖回归正常水平患者22例(27.5%),而观察组患者治疗后血糖平均水平为(5.52±2.8) mmol/L,血糖回归正常水平者53例(66.25%),两组治疗后血糖水平及血糖正常人数比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组患者治疗后的尿糖水平恢复正常21例(26.2%),而观察组为54例(67.5%),两者比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用普通药物联合增强型体外反搏治疗糖尿病患者疗效明显,值得临床上进一步完善推广应用。
目的:觀察增彊型體外反搏治療糖尿病患者的療效。方法從惠東縣人民醫院選取160例糖尿病腎病患者,根據治療方法分為對照組和觀察組各80例,對照組採用普通藥物治療,觀察組採用普通藥物聯閤增彊型體外反搏治療,對兩組患者的血糖水平及其尿糖含量進行檢測併統計分析。結果對照組患者治療後的血糖平均水平為(7.43±3.1) mmol/L,血糖迴歸正常水平患者22例(27.5%),而觀察組患者治療後血糖平均水平為(5.52±2.8) mmol/L,血糖迴歸正常水平者53例(66.25%),兩組治療後血糖水平及血糖正常人數比較差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05);對照組患者治療後的尿糖水平恢複正常21例(26.2%),而觀察組為54例(67.5%),兩者比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論採用普通藥物聯閤增彊型體外反搏治療糖尿病患者療效明顯,值得臨床上進一步完善推廣應用。
목적:관찰증강형체외반박치료당뇨병환자적료효。방법종혜동현인민의원선취160례당뇨병신병환자,근거치료방법분위대조조화관찰조각80례,대조조채용보통약물치료,관찰조채용보통약물연합증강형체외반박치료,대량조환자적혈당수평급기뇨당함량진행검측병통계분석。결과대조조환자치료후적혈당평균수평위(7.43±3.1) mmol/L,혈당회귀정상수평환자22례(27.5%),이관찰조환자치료후혈당평균수평위(5.52±2.8) mmol/L,혈당회귀정상수평자53례(66.25%),량조치료후혈당수평급혈당정상인수비교차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05);대조조환자치료후적뇨당수평회복정상21례(26.2%),이관찰조위54례(67.5%),량자비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론채용보통약물연합증강형체외반박치료당뇨병환자료효명현,치득림상상진일보완선추엄응용。
Objective To observe the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Methods A total of 160 patients with diabetic nephropathy in the People's Hospital of Huidong were selected and divided into two groups according to the therapeutic methods. The patients in the control group (n=80) were treated with oral medication and the patients in the observation group (n=80) were treated with oral medication and enhanced external counterpulsation. The blood glucose level and urine glu-cose level of patients in both group were tested and analyzed. Results After the treatment, there were signifi-cant differences in the average blood glucose of patients and the number of patients with euglycemia between the control group and the observation group [(7.43±3.1) mmol/L vs (5.52±2.8) mmol/L, 22 vs 53, P<0.05]. There was significant difference in the number of patients with normal urine glucose level between the control group and the obser-vation group (21 vs 54, P<0.05). Conclusion The enhanced external counterpulsation combined with oral medica-tion is effective in clinic and worthy of wide application.