中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2013年
8期
716-718
,共3页
李丹%朱春燕%汪凯%余凤琼%叶榕%谢新晖%刘云峰%李丹丹
李丹%硃春燕%汪凱%餘鳳瓊%葉榕%謝新暉%劉雲峰%李丹丹
리단%주춘연%왕개%여봉경%협용%사신휘%류운봉%리단단
注视方向%社交焦虑%情绪面孔%眼动
註視方嚮%社交焦慮%情緒麵孔%眼動
주시방향%사교초필%정서면공%안동
Gaze direction%Social anxiety%Emotional faces%Eye movement
目的 探讨注视方向线索对社交焦虑个体面部表情加工的影响.方法 从安徽医科大学抽取56名本科生,依Liebowitz社交焦虑量表(LSAS)得分将被试分为高社交焦虑组(HSA)和低社交焦虑组(LSA),采用配对的厌恶和中性面孔作为实验刺激材料并记录眼动数据.结果 直视条件下,HSA组注视厌恶面孔的时间为(2311.09±521.41)ms,注视中性面孔的时间为(1910.69±607.59)ms,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),LSA组注视厌恶面孔与中性面孔的时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);斜视条件下,HSA与LSA注视厌恶面孔与中性面孔的时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 注视方向影响了社交焦虑个体对厌恶表情的加工,表明直视的厌恶面孔对于HSA个体来说是一种社交威胁信息,斜视的厌恶面孔不是明确的社交威胁信息.
目的 探討註視方嚮線索對社交焦慮箇體麵部錶情加工的影響.方法 從安徽醫科大學抽取56名本科生,依Liebowitz社交焦慮量錶(LSAS)得分將被試分為高社交焦慮組(HSA)和低社交焦慮組(LSA),採用配對的厭噁和中性麵孔作為實驗刺激材料併記錄眼動數據.結果 直視條件下,HSA組註視厭噁麵孔的時間為(2311.09±521.41)ms,註視中性麵孔的時間為(1910.69±607.59)ms,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),LSA組註視厭噁麵孔與中性麵孔的時間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);斜視條件下,HSA與LSA註視厭噁麵孔與中性麵孔的時間差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 註視方嚮影響瞭社交焦慮箇體對厭噁錶情的加工,錶明直視的厭噁麵孔對于HSA箇體來說是一種社交威脅信息,斜視的厭噁麵孔不是明確的社交威脅信息.
목적 탐토주시방향선색대사교초필개체면부표정가공적영향.방법 종안휘의과대학추취56명본과생,의Liebowitz사교초필량표(LSAS)득분장피시분위고사교초필조(HSA)화저사교초필조(LSA),채용배대적염악화중성면공작위실험자격재료병기록안동수거.결과 직시조건하,HSA조주시염악면공적시간위(2311.09±521.41)ms,주시중성면공적시간위(1910.69±607.59)ms,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),LSA조주시염악면공여중성면공적시간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);사시조건하,HSA여LSA주시염악면공여중성면공적시간차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 주시방향영향료사교초필개체대염악표정적가공,표명직시적염악면공대우HSA개체래설시일충사교위협신식,사시적염악면공불시명학적사교위협신식.
Objective To explore the effects of gaze direction in the processing of facial expression among socially anxious individuals.Methods 56 students were selected from Anhui Medical University.Based on Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) scores,the subjects were grouped into high socially anxious individuals (HSA) and low socially anxious individuals(LSA).Eye movements were recorded while pairs of disgust and neutral faces as experimental stimulus were presented.Results Under the direct gaze condition,there were significant differences (P < 0.05) between the total dwell time of disgust faces ((2311.09 ± 521.41) ms) and the neutral faces((1910.69 ±607.59)ms) in HSA,while there were no significant differences in LSA(P>0.05).Under the averted gaze condition,the total dwell time were not significant between disgust faces and neutral faces in HSA and LSA (P > 0.05).Conclusion Gaze direction affects the processing of facial expressions among socially anxious individuals.Disgust face with direct gaze may be perceived as a social threat information for socially anxiety individuals,whereas disgust face with averted gaze is not a clear social threat information.