CAJ | 학술논문

无论从纠纷自身的表现形态，还是从公民维权本能的角度来说，消费者群体性纠纷都有其存在的正当性，同时具备修正社会制度、促成良性纠纷解决机制形成的积极性价值。从争议客体的属性来说，消费者群体性纠纷则具有不同于群体性事件的私益性和非政治性，这一特性决定了消费者群体纠纷的解决必须依赖于司法审判模式。然而，目前中国消费类群体性纠纷的解决方式仍是以政府为主导的自上而下的解决模式，司法审判模式已经被边缘化甚至政治化。因此，矫正目前消费者群体性纠纷解决中的模式错位，在制度层面构建以司法审判模式为主导的“类型化”纠纷解决机制成为恢复消费者维权机制正常化运行、最终实现保护消费者合法权益的关键所在。
무론종규분자신적표현형태，환시종공민유권본능적각도래설，소비자군체성규분도유기존재적정당성，동시구비수정사회제도、촉성량성규분해결궤제형성적적겁성개치。종쟁의객체적속성래설，소비자군체성규분칙구유불동우군체성사건적사익성화비정치성，저일특성결정료소비자군체규분적해결필수의뢰우사법심판모식。연이，목전중국소비류군체성규분적해결방식잉시이정부위주도적자상이하적해결모식，사법심판모식이경피변연화심지정치화。인차，교정목전소비자군체성규분해결중적모식착위，재제도층면구건이사법심판모식위주도적“류형화”규분해결궤제성위회복소비자유권궤제정상화운행、최종실현보호소비자합법권익적관건소재。
There is good reasons for the existence of consumer group dispute no matter from the way it shows or citizens ’ natural right protecting .It also contributes to social system im-provement and healthy dispute saluting system .As far as the nature of objects , it differs from group events which are for benefit and non-political character .This leads consumer group dis-putes to judicial solutions .However,presently such cases in China depends more on administra-tion solutions , where judicial judgment has actually been marginalized or even politicized .To correct this,a type-oriented dispute saluting system with judicial judgment is suggested to set up.