黑龙江科学
黑龍江科學
흑룡강과학
Helongjiang Science
2014年
10期
21-23
,共3页
李月兴%宋治杰%方振兴%夏海涛
李月興%宋治傑%方振興%夏海濤
리월흥%송치걸%방진흥%하해도
五大连池%二龙眼泉%降水量%时滞效应
五大連池%二龍眼泉%降水量%時滯效應
오대련지%이용안천%강수량%시체효응
Wudalianchi%Erlong spring%precipitation%time lag effect
五大连池二龙眼泉年内泉流量与当地降水量的变化趋势相似,具有很强的相关性,其峰值明显迟滞于降水量。利用峰值时段差、回归分析等方法分析了其时滞效应。其中利用峰值时段差法结果显示时滞时间为3个月,回归分析方法显示其时滞时间为4个月,其中前推3个月的降水量对泉流量的影响最大。
五大連池二龍眼泉年內泉流量與噹地降水量的變化趨勢相似,具有很彊的相關性,其峰值明顯遲滯于降水量。利用峰值時段差、迴歸分析等方法分析瞭其時滯效應。其中利用峰值時段差法結果顯示時滯時間為3箇月,迴歸分析方法顯示其時滯時間為4箇月,其中前推3箇月的降水量對泉流量的影響最大。
오대련지이용안천년내천류량여당지강수량적변화추세상사,구유흔강적상관성,기봉치명현지체우강수량。이용봉치시단차、회귀분석등방법분석료기시체효응。기중이용봉치시단차법결과현시시체시간위3개월,회귀분석방법현시기시체시간위4개월,기중전추3개월적강수량대천류량적영향최대。
The change trend of Wudalianchi Erlong spring flow was similar with local precipitation,there was a strong correlation between them but the peak value of spring flow appeared much later than the precipitation. In this article,the author used two methods to analyze the data. The peak value analysis showed that the lag time was 3 months. The regression analysis showed its lag time was 4 months and the time of precipitation which had the maximum effect on spring flow was 3 months in advance.