国际中医中药杂志
國際中醫中藥雜誌
국제중의중약잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRIDITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
9期
782-788
,共7页
张晓朦%吴嘉瑞%张冰%盛晓光
張曉朦%吳嘉瑞%張冰%盛曉光
장효몽%오가서%장빙%성효광
复方丹参注射液%不稳定型心绞痛%随机对照试验%系统评价
複方丹參註射液%不穩定型心絞痛%隨機對照試驗%繫統評價
복방단삼주사액%불은정형심교통%수궤대조시험%계통평개
Fufang-Danshen injection%Unstable angina pectoris%Randomized controlled trials%Systemic review
目的:系统评价复方丹参注射液(FD)治疗不稳定型心绞痛(UAP)的临床疗效及安全性。方法计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中文科技期刊全文数据库(VIP)、万方数据库、PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library等,全面搜集有关FD治疗UAP的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验,采用 Cochrane 风险评价表评价其研究质量,提取资料并通过RevMan5.2进行数据分析。结果共纳入13篇研究,共计受试者1156例。Meta分析的结果显示:①心绞痛疗效总有效率:FD+常规治疗(WM)对WM,两组差异有统计学意义[RR=1.32,95%CI(1.21,1.43), P<0.01];FD+低分子肝素+WM对WM,两组差异有统计学意义[RR=1.29,95%CI(1.17,1.42), P<0.01],均表明治疗组疗效优于对照组。其余干预措施,FD+WM对低分子肝素+WM与FD对WM的治疗组与对照组间差异无统计学意义。②心电图疗效总有效率:FD+WM对WM,两组差异有统计学意义[RR=1.34,95% CI(1.14,1.57),P<0.01];FD对WM,两组差异有统计学意义[RR=1.49,95%CI(1.13,1.96),P<0.01],表明治疗组可有效改善心电图疗效总有效率。③心绞痛发作次数:FD+WM对WM,两组差异有统计学意义[MD=1.07,95% CI(0.48,1.66),P<0.01]。其他分析未见组间差异。④不良反应:4篇文献明确表示无不良反应发生,4篇文献报道了不良反应,多为头痛、恶心、面色潮红等,不影响治疗。治疗组出现不良反应9例,对照组9例。结论 FD用于治疗UAP具有一定的疗效,安全性相对可靠。但因纳入文献质量不高且存在偏倚,需进一步研究。
目的:繫統評價複方丹參註射液(FD)治療不穩定型心絞痛(UAP)的臨床療效及安全性。方法計算機檢索中國期刊全文數據庫(CNKI)、中國生物醫學文獻數據庫(CBM)、中文科技期刊全文數據庫(VIP)、萬方數據庫、PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library等,全麵搜集有關FD治療UAP的隨機對照試驗和半隨機對照試驗,採用 Cochrane 風險評價錶評價其研究質量,提取資料併通過RevMan5.2進行數據分析。結果共納入13篇研究,共計受試者1156例。Meta分析的結果顯示:①心絞痛療效總有效率:FD+常規治療(WM)對WM,兩組差異有統計學意義[RR=1.32,95%CI(1.21,1.43), P<0.01];FD+低分子肝素+WM對WM,兩組差異有統計學意義[RR=1.29,95%CI(1.17,1.42), P<0.01],均錶明治療組療效優于對照組。其餘榦預措施,FD+WM對低分子肝素+WM與FD對WM的治療組與對照組間差異無統計學意義。②心電圖療效總有效率:FD+WM對WM,兩組差異有統計學意義[RR=1.34,95% CI(1.14,1.57),P<0.01];FD對WM,兩組差異有統計學意義[RR=1.49,95%CI(1.13,1.96),P<0.01],錶明治療組可有效改善心電圖療效總有效率。③心絞痛髮作次數:FD+WM對WM,兩組差異有統計學意義[MD=1.07,95% CI(0.48,1.66),P<0.01]。其他分析未見組間差異。④不良反應:4篇文獻明確錶示無不良反應髮生,4篇文獻報道瞭不良反應,多為頭痛、噁心、麵色潮紅等,不影響治療。治療組齣現不良反應9例,對照組9例。結論 FD用于治療UAP具有一定的療效,安全性相對可靠。但因納入文獻質量不高且存在偏倚,需進一步研究。
목적:계통평개복방단삼주사액(FD)치료불은정형심교통(UAP)적림상료효급안전성。방법계산궤검색중국기간전문수거고(CNKI)、중국생물의학문헌수거고(CBM)、중문과기기간전문수거고(VIP)、만방수거고、PubMed、Embase화Cochrane Library등,전면수집유관FD치료UAP적수궤대조시험화반수궤대조시험,채용 Cochrane 풍험평개표평개기연구질량,제취자료병통과RevMan5.2진행수거분석。결과공납입13편연구,공계수시자1156례。Meta분석적결과현시:①심교통료효총유효솔:FD+상규치료(WM)대WM,량조차이유통계학의의[RR=1.32,95%CI(1.21,1.43), P<0.01];FD+저분자간소+WM대WM,량조차이유통계학의의[RR=1.29,95%CI(1.17,1.42), P<0.01],균표명치료조료효우우대조조。기여간예조시,FD+WM대저분자간소+WM여FD대WM적치료조여대조조간차이무통계학의의。②심전도료효총유효솔:FD+WM대WM,량조차이유통계학의의[RR=1.34,95% CI(1.14,1.57),P<0.01];FD대WM,량조차이유통계학의의[RR=1.49,95%CI(1.13,1.96),P<0.01],표명치료조가유효개선심전도료효총유효솔。③심교통발작차수:FD+WM대WM,량조차이유통계학의의[MD=1.07,95% CI(0.48,1.66),P<0.01]。기타분석미견조간차이。④불량반응:4편문헌명학표시무불량반응발생,4편문헌보도료불량반응,다위두통、악심、면색조홍등,불영향치료。치료조출현불량반응9례,대조조9례。결론 FD용우치료UAP구유일정적료효,안전성상대가고。단인납입문헌질량불고차존재편의,수진일보연구。
Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Fufang-Danshen Injection (FD) in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris(UAP). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs regarding FD in the treatment of UAP were collected through comprehensive searches of China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database(VIP), Wan fang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database(CBM), PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from January 1979 to December 2013. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies by the Cochrane risk of bias, and extracted the information from the included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted with the software Review Manager 5.2. Results A total of 13 studies with 1156 participants were included. In the meta-analysis, ①the total effective rate of UAP:in term of FD+conventional therapy with western medicine(WM)vsWM, the difference between two groups was statistically significant [RR=1.32, 95%CI(1.21, 1.43), P<0.01]; FD+low molecular weight heparin+WM vs WM, difference between two groups was also statistically significant [RR=1.29, 95% CI(1.17, 1.42), P<0.01], which indicated that the efficacy of experimental group was higher than the control group. Other interventions, such as FD+WM vs low molecular weight heparin+WM and FD vs WM, there was no significant difference between two groups. ②the total effective rate of ECG:in term of FD+WM vs WM, the difference between two groups was statistically significant [RR=1.34, 95%CI (1.14, 1.57), P<0.01]; in term of FD vs WM, difference between two groups was statistically significant [RR=1.49, 95%CI(1.13, 1.96), P<0.01], which indicated that experimental group can effectively improve the total effective rate of ECG. ③ frequency of angina attacks:in term of FD+WM vs WM, the difference between two groups was statistically significant [MD=1.07, 95%CI(0.48, 1.66), P<0.01]. No differences between groups existed in other analysis. ④ adverse drug reactions(ADRs):4 articles cleared that there was no ADRs in the studies, 4 studies reported ADRs, which represented headache, nausea, flushing and so on. There were 9 cases in the experimental group, and 9 in control group. Conclusion Based on the meta-analysis, FD was effective and relatively safe for the treatment of UAP in clinical. However, since the articles enrolled in the study were not in high quality, more qualified studies should be conducted for the further assessment of efficacy and safety of FD for UAP.