中国性科学
中國性科學
중국성과학
THE CHINESE JOURNAL OF HUMAN SEXUALITY
2014年
9期
17-20
,共4页
李韬%谢胜%谢子平%王万荣%王澍弘%欧阳海%康照鹏%谭艳
李韜%謝勝%謝子平%王萬榮%王澍弘%歐暘海%康照鵬%譚豔
리도%사성%사자평%왕만영%왕주홍%구양해%강조붕%담염
慢性非细菌性前列腺炎%α受体阻滞剂%体外短波治疗仪%联合治疗
慢性非細菌性前列腺炎%α受體阻滯劑%體外短波治療儀%聯閤治療
만성비세균성전렬선염%α수체조체제%체외단파치료의%연합치료
Chronic nonbacterial prostatitis%α-blockers%External shortwave treatment%Combined treatment
目的:评估α受体阻滞剂联合体外短波治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法:收治180例慢性非细菌性前列腺炎患者依据NIH-CPSI评分及前列腺液结果,随机分为治疗组(α受体阻滞剂联合体外短波治疗组)和对照组(单一α受体阻滞剂治疗组、单一体外短波治疗组),每组60例,治疗4周后,对比分析三组患者治疗前后的NIH-CPSI评分,比较三组的疗效。结果:三组患者均能有效缓解慢性非细菌性前列腺炎患者症状。联合治疗组的NIH-CPSI评分改善情况较其他两组明显。α受体阻滞剂组治愈率26%,总有效率72%;体外短波组治愈率20%,总有效率66.7%;联合治疗组总有效率为93.3%,治愈率为48%.治疗过程中均未见明显不良副反应。治愈率、总有效率比较,联合治疗组显著高于单一治疗组(P<0.05)。结论:对于伴有下尿路症状的慢性非细菌性前列腺炎患者,α受体阻滞剂联合体外短波治疗具有治愈率高、安全性好、并发症少等优点;能迅速有效地改善CNP 患者的临床症状,在临床上值得推广应用。
目的:評估α受體阻滯劑聯閤體外短波治療慢性非細菌性前列腺炎的臨床療效。方法:收治180例慢性非細菌性前列腺炎患者依據NIH-CPSI評分及前列腺液結果,隨機分為治療組(α受體阻滯劑聯閤體外短波治療組)和對照組(單一α受體阻滯劑治療組、單一體外短波治療組),每組60例,治療4週後,對比分析三組患者治療前後的NIH-CPSI評分,比較三組的療效。結果:三組患者均能有效緩解慢性非細菌性前列腺炎患者癥狀。聯閤治療組的NIH-CPSI評分改善情況較其他兩組明顯。α受體阻滯劑組治愈率26%,總有效率72%;體外短波組治愈率20%,總有效率66.7%;聯閤治療組總有效率為93.3%,治愈率為48%.治療過程中均未見明顯不良副反應。治愈率、總有效率比較,聯閤治療組顯著高于單一治療組(P<0.05)。結論:對于伴有下尿路癥狀的慢性非細菌性前列腺炎患者,α受體阻滯劑聯閤體外短波治療具有治愈率高、安全性好、併髮癥少等優點;能迅速有效地改善CNP 患者的臨床癥狀,在臨床上值得推廣應用。
목적:평고α수체조체제연합체외단파치료만성비세균성전렬선염적림상료효。방법:수치180례만성비세균성전렬선염환자의거NIH-CPSI평분급전렬선액결과,수궤분위치료조(α수체조체제연합체외단파치료조)화대조조(단일α수체조체제치료조、단일체외단파치료조),매조60례,치료4주후,대비분석삼조환자치료전후적NIH-CPSI평분,비교삼조적료효。결과:삼조환자균능유효완해만성비세균성전렬선염환자증상。연합치료조적NIH-CPSI평분개선정황교기타량조명현。α수체조체제조치유솔26%,총유효솔72%;체외단파조치유솔20%,총유효솔66.7%;연합치료조총유효솔위93.3%,치유솔위48%.치료과정중균미견명현불량부반응。치유솔、총유효솔비교,연합치료조현저고우단일치료조(P<0.05)。결론:대우반유하뇨로증상적만성비세균성전렬선염환자,α수체조체제연합체외단파치료구유치유솔고、안전성호、병발증소등우점;능신속유효지개선CNP 환자적림상증상,재림상상치득추엄응용。
Objectives:To investigate the clinical effect ofα-blockers and external shortwave treatment on Chronic Nonbacterial Prostatitis(CNP).Methods:According to the score of NIH-CPSI and prostate fluid examina-tion results,1 80 patients with CNP were selected and randomly divided into the control groups(α-blockers group and external shortwave group)and the treatment group (the combined treatment group),with 60 patients in each group.After 4weeks of treatment,the pre-and post-treatment scores on NIH-CPSI pain symptoms and the curative effect of each group were compared.Results:The symptoms of CNP in three groups were all improve effectively.As for the score of NIH-CPSI pain symptoms,the treatment group was even more significantly improved than the control group (P<0 .01 ).The total effective rate and curative rate of the treatment group were 93.3%and 48%, which was significantly higher than that in the control groups (α-blockers group with total effective rate of 72%and curative rate of 26%,the external shortwave group with total effective rate of 66.7%and curative rate of 20%)(P<0.05).No obvious adverse reaction happened in the process of treatment.Conclusion:For the CNP patients with the urinary tract symptoms,the combined treatment ofα-blockers and external shortwave treatment can more signifi-cantly improve the symptoms of patients than the separate treatment,which has the advantages of high cure rate,se-curity and fewer complications.It is worthy of clinical application.