中国性科学
中國性科學
중국성과학
THE CHINESE JOURNAL OF HUMAN SEXUALITY
2014年
9期
76-78
,共3页
叶松%曹凤妹%詹永春%汤琪乐
葉鬆%曹鳳妹%詹永春%湯琪樂
협송%조봉매%첨영춘%탕기악
子宫内膜病变%不孕%病理
子宮內膜病變%不孕%病理
자궁내막병변%불잉%병리
Endometrial lesions%Infertility%Pathology
目的:探讨不孕患者子宫内膜病变的病理类型以及对治疗效果的影响。方法:选取不孕患者104例,于月经来潮后12h内行诊断性刮宫并进行病理分析。分泌反应类患者给予活血补肾为主的中医治疗,增生反应类患者给予克罗米芬口服。结果:子宫内膜病变中以分泌类反应较多,其中尤其以分泌欠佳所占比例最大,而增生类反应中以增生反应较多见。不同程度分泌异常患者随着病变严重程度增加,治疗效果也越来越差,组间比较差异明显,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同类型增生异常患者治疗效果差别不大,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:分泌类反应患者的病理诊断有助于对患者预后作出判断;增生类反应者虽然不同类型预后差别不大,但是治疗手段却不同,因此病理诊断也十分必要。
目的:探討不孕患者子宮內膜病變的病理類型以及對治療效果的影響。方法:選取不孕患者104例,于月經來潮後12h內行診斷性颳宮併進行病理分析。分泌反應類患者給予活血補腎為主的中醫治療,增生反應類患者給予剋囉米芬口服。結果:子宮內膜病變中以分泌類反應較多,其中尤其以分泌欠佳所佔比例最大,而增生類反應中以增生反應較多見。不同程度分泌異常患者隨著病變嚴重程度增加,治療效果也越來越差,組間比較差異明顯,具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。不同類型增生異常患者治療效果差彆不大,無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:分泌類反應患者的病理診斷有助于對患者預後作齣判斷;增生類反應者雖然不同類型預後差彆不大,但是治療手段卻不同,因此病理診斷也十分必要。
목적:탐토불잉환자자궁내막병변적병리류형이급대치료효과적영향。방법:선취불잉환자104례,우월경래조후12h내행진단성괄궁병진행병리분석。분비반응류환자급여활혈보신위주적중의치료,증생반응류환자급여극라미분구복。결과:자궁내막병변중이분비류반응교다,기중우기이분비흠가소점비례최대,이증생류반응중이증생반응교다견。불동정도분비이상환자수착병변엄중정도증가,치료효과야월래월차,조간비교차이명현,구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。불동류형증생이상환자치료효과차별불대,무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:분비류반응환자적병리진단유조우대환자예후작출판단;증생류반응자수연불동류형예후차별불대,단시치료수단각불동,인차병리진단야십분필요。
Objectives:To investigate the pathological type of infertility patients with endometrial lesions and their impact on the treatment effect.Methods:1 04 infertile patients were selected and applied diagnostic curet-tage within 1 2h since the beginning of menstrual period for pathological analysis.Patients in the secretory reaction class received Chinese medicine treatment highlighting Huoxue tonifying the kidney;patients in the proliferative re-sponse class were given oral clomiphene citrate.Results:Of the endometrial lesions,secretion response took the majority,especially poor secretion;while for the proliferation class,proliferative reaction was the majority.With the increasing severity degrees of diacrisis,treatment effect was getting worse and worse,with statistically significant differences between groups (P<0.05 ).For patients with different types of abnormal hyperplasia,treatment effect was not very different with no statistical significance (P>0.05).Conclusion:The pathological diagnosis of patients in the secretory response class is helpful to judge the prognosis;while for patients with proliferative response;al-though prognostic difference is not significant,treatment methods are different,so it is very necessary for pathologi-cal diagnosis.