浙江医学
浙江醫學
절강의학
ZHEJIANG MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
18期
1550-1552
,共3页
龈下刮治和根面平整术%牙本质过敏%半导体激光%MS-COAT
齦下颳治和根麵平整術%牙本質過敏%半導體激光%MS-COAT
간하괄치화근면평정술%아본질과민%반도체격광%MS-COAT
Subgingival scaling root planing%Dental hypersensitiveness%Diode laser%MS- COAT
目的:探讨半导体激光和MS- COAT脱敏剂治疗龈下刮治和根面平整术后根面牙本质过敏的临床疗效。方法将接受龈下刮治及根面平整术后出现根面牙本质过敏的慢性牙周炎患者34例(共266颗患牙)随机分为两组,分别采用半导体激光和MS- COAT脱敏剂脱敏,对即刻疗效和1个月后疗效进行评价,并记录不良反应。结果即刻有效率半导体激光组为96.10%, MS- COAT脱敏剂组为95.60%,两组无统计学差异(P>0.05)。1个月后有效率半导体激光组为91.50%,MS- COAT脱敏剂组为84.60%,两组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。两组患者均无并发症发生。结论两种方法对治疗龈下刮治和根面平整术后产生的根面牙本质过敏的疗效均较明显,操作安全方便。远期疗效以半导体激光更优。
目的:探討半導體激光和MS- COAT脫敏劑治療齦下颳治和根麵平整術後根麵牙本質過敏的臨床療效。方法將接受齦下颳治及根麵平整術後齣現根麵牙本質過敏的慢性牙週炎患者34例(共266顆患牙)隨機分為兩組,分彆採用半導體激光和MS- COAT脫敏劑脫敏,對即刻療效和1箇月後療效進行評價,併記錄不良反應。結果即刻有效率半導體激光組為96.10%, MS- COAT脫敏劑組為95.60%,兩組無統計學差異(P>0.05)。1箇月後有效率半導體激光組為91.50%,MS- COAT脫敏劑組為84.60%,兩組比較有統計學差異(P<0.05)。兩組患者均無併髮癥髮生。結論兩種方法對治療齦下颳治和根麵平整術後產生的根麵牙本質過敏的療效均較明顯,操作安全方便。遠期療效以半導體激光更優。
목적:탐토반도체격광화MS- COAT탈민제치료간하괄치화근면평정술후근면아본질과민적림상료효。방법장접수간하괄치급근면평정술후출현근면아본질과민적만성아주염환자34례(공266과환아)수궤분위량조,분별채용반도체격광화MS- COAT탈민제탈민,대즉각료효화1개월후료효진행평개,병기록불량반응。결과즉각유효솔반도체격광조위96.10%, MS- COAT탈민제조위95.60%,량조무통계학차이(P>0.05)。1개월후유효솔반도체격광조위91.50%,MS- COAT탈민제조위84.60%,량조비교유통계학차이(P<0.05)。량조환자균무병발증발생。결론량충방법대치료간하괄치화근면평정술후산생적근면아본질과민적료효균교명현,조작안전방편。원기료효이반도체격광경우。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of diode laser with MS- COAT desensitizer in treatment of dental hy-persensitiveness after subgingival scaling and root planing. Methods Thirty four patients (266 teeth) with dentine hypersensi-tivity after scaling and root planing were randomly assigned to receive diode laser (130 teeth) or MS- COAT desensitizer (136 teeth) for treatment, respectively. The effects immediately and one month after treatment were evaluated and the adverse reac-tions were recorded. Results The immediate postoperative effective rate of diode laser group and MS- COAT desensitizer group were 96.10% and 95.60%(P>0.05), respectively. The one- month effective rate in diode laser group was significantly higher than that in MS- COAT desensitizer group (91.50%vs 84.60%, P<0.05). No complications were observed in both groups. Conclusion The two types of treatment for dental hypersensitiveness after scaling and root planing are effective, safe and conve-nient. Diode laser is better in long- term efficacy.